It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If you read the OP properly you will find that his reference states "The Victorian Government is investigating".
The OP also states that the Gippsland Cat was proven to be just a feral cat.
Regarding your statement that the shooter provided other photo's I cannot find any unless you mean this one:
Sorry, but the Tasmanian Tiger and Panther sightings, like the Yowee, belong in the same drawer as Alice in Wonderland.
Melbourne-based big cats researcher Michael Moss said he had been telephoned by a DSE scientist wanting copies of his research and who asked him to keep the contact secret.
"There is no doubt they (big cats) are out there," Mr Moss said, adding that the recent rediscovery of the Tiger Quoll in the Otways again proved how easy it was for animals to remain undetected in wilderness area for long periods of time.
Any other ideas on the need for secrecy?
I have perhaps been a little too flippant in my replies which has cause you some offense for which I unreservedly apologize. However, I think the following cartoon from Victoria's largest daily Newspaper, The Melbourne Herald-Sun, sums the situation up very simply.
Believe me, there have been many investigations into these so-called "Big-Cat" events and no evidence has been, or ever will be, found.
Originally posted by MegaSpace
I find it odd that there has been no reports of injured people or been killed from such large cats? or even hospital records showing patients having been hospitalized by attacks from such a large cat. Am i wrong? Have i missed any news articles showing that there have been reports indeed in the news media that people have been attacked?edit on 23-8-2012 by MegaSpace because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
I would say there is something there, what exactly remains to be seen but Australia is unusual in that it doesn't have a known big cat of it's own. Very unusual infant can anybody shed some light on why we don't.
Originally posted by OzTiger
Feral cats are, and always have been, a problem in Country Victoria as people tend to 'dump' their unwanted domestic cats with increasing regularity in the 'bush'. A small coastal town in West Gippsland has just announced that a recent 'trapping safari' has netted over 60 feral cats which were destroying local fauna.
The American 'Regimental Mascot' stories were debunked years ago.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
I personally believe you have large cats, probably panthers or pumas in that area of Victoria.
What's your take on the Tasmanian Tiger? I also believe that they are not completely extinct, endangered but not extinct. Seems to me that even though Tasmania is small there is still plenty of room for those Thylo's to go about their business unobserved. They've only been extinct for 100 years, thats not too long. Bet there are a few the hunters missed that keep a low profile way out in the bush trying to make a population comeback. At least I hope so.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
Originally posted by WorkingClassMan
I would say there is something there, what exactly remains to be seen but Australia is unusual in that it doesn't have a known big cat of it's own. Very unusual infant can anybody shed some light on why we don't.
Hi there. Zoologist here.
So there are three types of mammals. Monotremes, marsupials, and placental mammals. They're differentiated in terms of how they reproduce. Monotremes are the most ancestral and members of each group are more closely related to each other than to any animals in the other groups.
Monotremes are only found in Australia and New Guinea. Marsupials are mostly found in Australia and New Guinea. Australia is cool because since there weren't historically placental mammals at all except for bats, things tended to develop to *look like* species that we have here in North America or in Europe or other places. The thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger... probably are some left on at least one large island near Australia) looks like a carnivore, acts like a carnivore, but it's really not a carnivore... not a member of the Carnivora order.
So if there were big cats either a) they would have to have been introduced (like the pumas, possibly, I don't know anything about that) or b) they're not actually cats, they're just big marsupials that look like cats... but I would think we'd know about that by now. Who knows, though.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
reply to post by OzTiger
Yeah how is the american army or marines going to get a wild puma, take it on a boat everywhere they go, keep it without the cat taking off a GI's arm once a week during feeding time, and take it for it's daily walks? Pretty easy one to debunk. But it's possible that rich folk who had estates nearby at one time may have released a pet cougar into the bush. Maybe a few and they have created a small population.
Any fancy estates with old money in the area. Or relics of old wealthy estates nearby where there may have been an irresponsible release of alien animals to australia?