It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Mitt Romney's Silent Majority:

page: 1
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 10:50 PM
link   
You all saw it on Chick-Fil-A Appreciation day. The gay liberals went berserk because someone supports traditional marriage. Well so does at least 600,000 other Americans! I believe that there a strong silent majority rallying around Mitt Romney. One that not even Obama will see coming.

We all know Romney is killing Obama in fundraising Money, but just where is this money coming from?

Now, strict conservatives will say that how dare Romney get money from liberal cities!!!! How dare he court money from democrats! But isn't that what we want? Money from everyone? Money from general non-political types who see the corruption in this country and maybe want to try a change?

Because in the end, the people no matter what political affiliation will speak. There is a silent majority slowly building against Obama. I have had people ask me where Romney's supporters are? Well, look around. Ask people on the street if they are voting for Obama! They may not know Mitt Romney or anything about him, but they'll tell you they won't vote for Obama.

Now these are just some of the most unlikely cities where Romney has raked in some serious cash that must have Obama scratching his head.

Federal Law states that an individual cannot give more than $30,800 to a political party.

NYC residents gave Romney nearly $600,000
San Francisco: $ 350,000 the average there was $400
Philadelphia: $250,000!
Even people from Chicago and Austin Texas are giving Romney between $200 and $30,000!
Someone in Florida Single Handedly raised $10,000 for Mitt Romney people who helped with the fundraiser cited their concerns with business regulations and the economy in general.

Newsweek had a cover article that spells it out: HIT THE ROAD BARACK!

www.foxnews.com...
www.businessweek.com...
Romney Raising Money Even From Liberal Areas:


edit on 21-8-2012 by jjf3rd77 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:07 PM
link   
I was young, but many in the media, thought Reagan wouldn't win against Carter. But the economy was bad then....Carter painted a picture of how bad things were, Reagan told the people how America would be great again.

Reagan won by a landslide. I think there is a real possibility that will happen. Sure the media, the mTV generation, hollywood will all go for Obama. But I think the average taxpaying, go to work, america will not vote for Obama again.



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:08 PM
link   
The silent majority will speak 11-06-12



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:10 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


The silent majority will be out in droves.

Obama has had it.

The eviction notice is ready to be nailed to the door.

Finally they can get rid of those overgrown weeds in the Rose Garden !!



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:11 PM
link   
reply to post by SrWingCommander
 


The media has to embed more" fake" support for Obama, because they have to milk all that campaign fund from Romney and Obama. BTW, Romney has more cash on hand.



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:18 PM
link   
For awhile there I was afraid even ATS was lost. Glad to see many people agree!

Romney/Ryan 2012!!!!



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


Yeah, I agree we're the minority on ATS. Anyhow, Romney/Ryan 2012!



posted on Aug, 21 2012 @ 11:49 PM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


There is no such thing as a traditional marriage. And no, people went nuts because they are supporting the discrimination of gay people to not be treated equally under the law.




We all know Romney is killing Obama in fundraising Money, but just where is this money coming from?



www.opensecrets.org...

Mitt Romney could not even pull a crowd in his home state of Michigan. This is in a state that elects republicans on a regular basis.


edit on 21-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)

edit on 22-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 


1. There is no such thing as a traditional marriage.

2.


3. Mitt Romney could not even pull a crowd in his home state of Michigan. This is in a state that elects republicans on a regular basis.


edit on 21-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)


1. It's called marriage between man and woman! That's how its been for thousands of years. But that is not what this thread is about.

2. not talking about those donors. These are individual donors

3. Way to use two pictures out of context, oh wait that was your whole response!




posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:07 AM
link   
reply to post by RealSpoke
 



Mitt Romney could not even pull a crowd in his home state of Michigan. This is in a state that elects republicans on a regular basis.


Feb 24th was a Friday.

All Republicans were at work


They were staying "silent".

And I thought that Obama rally was advertising a job fair ?
(or was it well-fair)



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:12 AM
link   
It's all over anyway now.

This just hit the wires.

The "hissing" majority has spoken.

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:15 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Yeah ok, because republicans are employed and democrats aren't.
Really nice inaccurate stereotype there.



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:18 AM
link   
reply to post by jjf3rd77
 



1. It's called marriage between man and woman! That's how its been for thousands of years. But that is not what this thread is about.


Wrong. The majority of the time it was one man and 20 other women.


2. not talking about those donors. These are individual donors


Sure they are


3. Way to use two pictures out of context, oh wait that was your whole response!


Then why are you replying to more things than the picture?



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:20 AM
link   
The whole OP is what you can expect from this guy..... So basically Romney is about as good as a anybody but Obama candidate? No one is really interested or cares about him, he will get the vote simply because he's not the POTUS....



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by xuenchen
 


Yeah ok, because republicans are employed and democrats aren't.
Really nice inaccurate stereotype there.


How is it a "stereotype" ?

Why would Democrats go to a Romney Rally ?




posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:39 AM
link   
Look left..... Doomed.

Look right..... Doomed.

Look at the rich men we have to vote for..... Duped.

I hope every one gets what they vote for.

4 more years of lies..... hey its been 12 so far..... Whats an other 4?

Like I said. I hope every one gets what they vote for.....



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:40 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


????

just nevermind.


edit on 22-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke

Wrong. The majority of the time it was one man and 20 other women.



Man those were the days.....



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 12:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by fallow the light
Look left..... Doomed.

Look right..... Doomed.

Look at the rich men we have to vote for..... Duped.

I hope every one gets what they vote for.

4 more years of lies..... hey its been 12 so far..... Whats an other 4?

Like I said. I hope every one gets what they vote for.....


If people have nothing to vote for than think of just this one thing....

Do you want a man that is on his second term with nothing to lose, or one that is restraint still on his first term. Sometimes I think our best defense until we get someone we really want is to keep these guys in first term only so that they don't go "full retard" in their second term...



edit on 22-8-2012 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2012 @ 01:05 AM
link   
reply to post by Xtrozero
 


I think giving retards a term at all, makes us retards ourselves.

When a retard is brought forth say, NO I don't want a retard as president.

Then demand a new candidate.

clowns to the left of me jokers to the right, here I am voting for retards again.



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join