It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
142 Responses to “Thought Police Kidnap Talk Show Host”
The deceitful “friend”, doesn’t concern me as much as the law enforcement apparatus which thinks it’s ok to arrest someone, on the basis of accusations FROM ONE PERSON ALONE upon allegation of “possible mental instability”……..
So apparently now in Amerika, anyone can say “I think so and so is mentally unstable….” and that is grounds to suspend rights and incarcerate ?
No criminal history……
No direct threats of violence…..
No additional witnesses to coroberate the initial accusations……
INCARCERATED AND “DIAGNOSED” WITH “PSYCHOSIS” ?
And keep in mind: “Psychiatry” has NO, and I mean ZERO medical basis whatsoever.
Watch “The marketing of Madness” on YouTube to learn what a scam “psychiatry” is.
Thought Police Kidnap Talk Show Host
Originally posted by deadeyedick
Nice job telling half the story.
Yes the ot is full of GOD's vengeance but when Jesus came he changed everything and told his followers to do no harm to anyone until his return.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
You are not alone in over looking that fact cause there is a whole world of ignorant so called Christians fighting wars offensively and not defending the truth.
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by deadeyedick
Nice job telling half the story.
Yes the ot is full of GOD's vengeance but when Jesus came he changed everything and told his followers to do no harm to anyone until his return.
I only quoted the OT and explained it as to clarify the Commandment to which the dude referred was not to murder as opposed to not to kill. I never addressed the New Testament in any way.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
You are not alone in over looking that fact cause there is a whole world of ignorant so called Christians fighting wars offensively and not defending the truth.
So if non-ignorant Christians fight in a war defending the truth us "harm" then ok? I am confused. That is not the point of this thread BTW. So let's not derail further. No one is attacking Christians - least of all me. I only wanted to clarify the Commandment - not debate the wonderfulness of Jesus.
I too yearn for return of Jesus so perhaps we have more in common than you think? He did a bang up job on my lawn a few years ago - he must have gone out of business though I had to get a new guy Jose who doesn't do nearly the same caliber work. Perhaps he didn't have the same philosophy as Jesus regarding the “do no harm” thing - he weed whacked all of my wife's hostas.
From the lost book of Golf - spoken thus to the husband who had to find alternative lawn care in the time after Jesus.
Woe unto he who harms the hostas sayeth the goodwife – longing for the days of Jesus.
Find Jesus, she commanded - tho verily he tried Jesus was no longer in the white pages and the husband was sore with worry for the return of Jesus also.
He gnashed his teeth and rent his clothing in despair for Jesus was $20.00 a week cheaper than the next lowest bidder.
- So it was written of Jesus in the book of Golf.
Originally posted by TheGreatDividerWhat a fool...
So if non-ignorant Christians fight in a war defending the truth us "harm" then ok?
I too yearn for return of Jesus so perhaps we have more in common than you think? He did a bang up job on my lawn a few years ago - he must have gone out of business though I had to get a new guy Jose who doesn't do nearly the same caliber work. Perhaps he didn't have the same philosophy as Jesus regarding the “do no harm” thing - he weed whacked all of my wife's hostas.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
That seems a tad bit racist.
Originally posted by MysticPearl
Then why wasn't Mr. Bush admitted to a psych ward for telling all us "God told me to invade Iraq"?
Seems that was a fair amount more harmful in the end than anything this guy did.
However, I believe this whole situation could have been easily avoided had the young man told the police officer that he did not consent to the officers request. From what I can gather, the "authorities" had no legal warrant to be on his property and no probable cause that a felony had been committed. The "authorities" were granted the power to do this by the very victim himself. If this man had known his rights and asserted them I don't think he would have suffered this ordeal. Egroff complying with the "authorities" because knew he had done no wrong is what wronged him.