It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EndlessFire
reply to post by SunnyDee
You're right, we should let people beat their children and pets and not interfere, it's not our place to decide how they live their lives.
You aren't killing weeds in the yard, this is human life we're talking about. It should not be as easy as getting weed killer at the garden center. Even criminals get a trial with a judge and jury before being put to death and you want to make sure people don't even have to see these humans before they are killed.
Originally posted by dragnik
Listen, you, your #ing idiots are providing nazi politics (and praxis) in Yugoslavia, destroying our Slavic peoples, plunging American, British and German children to families by force, organising the pressure to abort, making economical pressure, etc. Please, don't show yourself so naive, CIA, supporting Vatican, is working for nazis and for Germany, and for forces of axle.
Originally posted by milkyway12
If you have ever gotten an abortion because you dropped your pants one to many times, you are a murderer and deserve life in prison or the death penalty.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
RAPE is RAPE. There's no such thing as "legitimate rape" versus "illegitimate rape". These two want to relabel rape as forcible rape. ALL rape is forcible rape. The term "rape" itself is connotative as a forcible, violent act, carried out against the wishes of the rape victim.
Originally posted by jessejamesxx
There are a lot of "rapes" that happen in the US, where the woman get's drunk and regrets what she did the night before, and cries rape.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by beezzer
And these rights belong to whom?
When do Constitutional Rights Begin?
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States...
In its ruling the Supreme Court majority determined that Constitutional Rights did not extend to the unborn. The Supreme Court did not determine whether or not an unborn child is a person nor settle the issue of when life begins. In its ruling the Supreme Court determined that a mother's Right to privacy superseded the Right to life of the unborn.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by jessejamesxx
Originally posted by jessejamesxx
There are a lot of "rapes" that happen in the US, where the woman get's drunk and regrets what she did the night before, and cries rape.
Then, that's not rape, is it? It's a CHARGE of rape. If she is of age and consents, it ain't rape.
Originally posted by beezzer
BH, if the law ever changes, will you support the ruling that would give rights to unborn children?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by beezzer
Originally posted by beezzer
BH, if the law ever changes, will you support the ruling that would give rights to unborn children?
No. I would disagree with it, just as you disagree with the current law. What's the point?
I don't expect you to love the law.
Originally posted by milkyway12
---
If you have ever gotten an abortion because you dropped your pants one to many times, you are a murderer and deserve life in prison or the death penalty. I would say that to your face if you stomp around saying you got an abortion and it's your right to kill children. Screw condoms and birth control right? Just kill em.edit on 22-8-2012 by milkyway12 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
The reason why I asked, was that just because the law states something does not mandate that people have to like it, accept it.