It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
One other thing...I was once witness to a person brought in before I did a JOB that had incredible DETAILED INTELL. It was extraordinary. The man was in his late 50's and had a grey beard which he scratched causing beard dandruff to fall on the briefing table.
I was like...WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY!? Then he started slowly describing what we were going to be going into...what side of a large Hill would block the Moon Light as the Moon was to rise early in the Morning at 04:42...a number I will never forget. He described where stone Buildings would be...where certain other things I cannot discuss here would be. He had shaky hands and with my help we drew a map of the layout.
EVERY DETAIL WAS CORRECT! Right down to the Moon Rising and the period I will also not discuss that it would be blocked by the Hill. I was told later he was a REMOTE VIEWER! I never believed in such things...but I do now! Everything was exact...and I have a long term of experience and things like this ARE NEVER THAT EXACT!
Sometimes I get Intell from PRO's that has North as South! But this Guy knew everything! I never saw him again.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by nv4711
I thought...A GREAT DEAL...about what you have posted. I thought...maybe he had Satellite Mapping. Maybe he had been there before. Maybe he knew the Moon Periods as anyone can get that information.
Here is the thing. We get Sat Photos...we get very good intel...BUT NEVER TO THIS AMOUNT OF DETAIL! There is NO WAY...this person could know some of the things we were told! Not possible! Believe me....I am a HUGE SKEPTIC and I never just take someones word for it. I thought the whole thing was a bunch of Bull as he described actions and conditions that could ONLY occur AT RANDOM!
He was the real deal. Split Infinity
Originally posted by nv4711
Carl Sagan's "The Demon Haunted World" should be required reading for everyone. Then, maybe, a lot less people would fall for this kind of nonsense.edit on 16-10-2012 by nv4711 because: typo
Each Group is not compatible with other Groups as each Group has it's own Natural Laws and Constructs and Rules that may be so Alien in Nature as to not resemble any thing we would consider Physics or Cosmology.
Originally posted by bigthoughts
Originally posted by nv4711
Carl Sagan's "The Demon Haunted World" should be required reading for everyone. Then, maybe, a lot less people would fall for this kind of nonsense.edit on 16-10-2012 by nv4711 because: typo
First of all, I love the Sagan series. It leaves one with a sense of wonder and awe as to the expansiveness of the universe. The man was a hero to anyone who has a desire for the understanding of reality. But let us not assume that our assumtions are untestable. He lived in age age where much of the testing of our assumptions was in it's infancy. He made great strides towards both insipring many people to get involved in science and towards informing the general public as to the importance of understanding what new questions scientific discoveries had to offer.
I think it is important to remember that Einstien, one of the most prolific scientific minds of the last century, held strong reservations towards Quantum Mechanics. This theory, or rather group of theories, has become THE most successful theory mankind has ever concocted. I do agree that the physics questions regarding "spooky action at a distance", otherwise known as entanglement, do nessecarily elate to the premise that the theory is incomplete. But remember that an essential part of the scientific method it to test your assumptions.
-----snip----
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by bigthoughts
I may be wrong but I think you are not fully getting what I am saying. I am using a Model of the MULTIVERSE that can be compared to this analogy. Our Universe is FINITE...but our Universe is but one in an INFINITE GROUP of Divergent Universal Realities...all of which are slightly different than ours and have the same Natural Physical Laws.
"Let's always keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out"
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
Before I go further - In my opinion, Einstein's biggest "problem" was that Quantum mechanics didn't offer a theory explaining Gravity, as his Theory of General Relativity did. And yes, he scoffed at the idea of entanglement.
Originally posted by bigthoughts
"Let's always keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out"
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence"
Before I go further - In my opinion, Einstein's biggest "problem" was that Quantum mechanics didn't offer a theory explaining Gravity, as his Theory of General Relativity did. And yes, he scoffed at the idea of entanglement.
Let's go with NV, sorry that's the abbreviation I'll use. Einstein didn't explain gravity. He understood that he was in the same place as Newton in that respect. He devised a way to describe the effects of gravity and was able to devise a paradigm that described it in a much finer detail than Newton; though at this point his calculations are off by more than a few meters in regards to the position of the moon, but he never determined what gravity was.
Let us not forget that this is the underlying reason for the LHC. Searching for the Higgs Boson would allow us to find the missing piece in our so called "standard model." I'm not saying that the Standard Model is a bad idea. I'm just saying that it is incomplete. The fact that we are still looking for physical confirmation of it's theoretical components is evidence that we don't know everything; The metaphoric expansion.
That should be physical and metaphorical evidence, at the very least, that there are things we don't know and, therefore, can't measure; given that we don't know we need to measure them.
At this point I would like to point out MY favorite Sagan quote.....
"We base so much of our civilization on science and technology, but we make it so difficult to understand. It's a clear perscription for disaster." To me that means that if we know so much and are unwilling/unable to convey that understanding to the sacker at our local supermarket, then that is a fail on the part of those who could understand this particular thread. Remember that the "retard" in front of you in line at Walmart can offer you insight into the nature of existence as it applies to you if you are willing to see said insight. Ask yourself... "What am I missing?"
You're not so smart if no one understands you. -- Oh, oh, maybe that's a new quote. Nah prolly not.
Originally posted by Caultahgew
all the reasons of doubt in Bashar's validity have been explained at great length by Bashar. A lot of the things you are focusing on in regards to Bashar, is out of confusion because you haven't listened close enough.
Also, at first it's hard to understand some of his concepts because we have been raised to think of everything so linear.