It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sarra1833
reply to post by Slave NO MORE
I have to agree. I'm NOT for this global income just because if it WAS Enough, no one would work. And nothing would get done.
I was more pointing out that 1 dollar a day/10 dollars a month is a worse slap in the face to a poor person than getting zero, you know? Or panhandling, etc.
Originally posted by toolgal462
reply to post by mrMasterJoe
Fair enough. Thank you for your thoughtful and civilized answer. I was a bit on the defensive because of all the "hate on America" garbage I see so much on this website.
But you didn't do that, you made a fair criticism. Thanks for that, Sir.
Won't work. You give people a way to survive without contributing, they will not contribute. It would be cruel in fact.
We saw what this kind of system did to the former Soviets. Why would it be any different anywhere else?
Originally posted by Slave NO MORE
Originally posted by Maslo
I disagree with the maximum income very much. Big private capital is important for the advancement of humanity. Billionaires often invest into things that noone else will. This is one of the reasons why communist countries were a failure.
Ordinary high income tax for the wealthy is much better solution than any ad-hoc artificial cut-off.
I also believe that a company needs to be semi owned by the government.
So that means that every person can start a business but the government is 50% owner of it.
If there is a complaint by the public / other companies then the government can step in to force changes / improvements as demanded by other peoples / companies.
Besides if the government is in control of the cash, then we don't need the big corps to invest in innovation.
People could demand the government to invest / research some areas which has interest to us all.
Like for example the farma industry it's unbelievable that they have a monopoly position. besides if it was owned by the gov. it would mean that the distribution of meds can be free for everyone.
Originally posted by Slave NO MORE
Originally posted by subfab
reply to post by Slave NO MORE
for the individual:
i would like to see more finance education. how to balance a checkbook and a home budget. to learn not to go into debt. to learn how to save money. to have the option to be paid in gold backed currency.
for the politician:
no more carreer politicians. term limits for all elected position. their pay should reflect the people they represent. no representative should be eating steak when the people they represent can only afford top ramen noodles. if the average wage of the people they represent is $40k then that is what they get paid.
just some ideas off the top of my head.
subfab
edit on 15-8-2012 by subfab because: correct a typo
To prevent people getting into debt is also simple.
Create 2 valuta's.
1. is the primary money for paying rent and food. (Not usable to buy a PC or other luxury and also not able to trade it)
2. Luxury money to get recreation, luxury etc.
You can scrap credits this way since everyone has the basics for life and if you don't have the money to build a pool in ur garden than too bad for u, get a better job or start a new business. Go study to be able to get a better job.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by Slave NO MORE
Won't work. You give people a way to survive without contributing, they will not contribute. It would be cruel in fact.
We saw what this kind of system did to the former Soviets. Why would it be any different anywhere else?
These grandious notions are wonderful until you add the human factor. That is where they fail and fail miserably.
Look at the US. When we embraced Capitalism fully we prospered greatly and lead the world. Now we are on the path to a socialist society, we are slowly declining. History does not lie, it simply repeats itself...