It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by henryconspire
Originally posted by Spotless
reply to post by impaired
I'm pretty sure the government could think of something better on how to derail your thread than spammning pics of porn stars or whatever
Why ? Well, why not ? Internet is full of weird people. Don't wind up on stuff like this.
Originally posted by Spotless
reply to post by impaired
I'm pretty sure the government could think of something better on how to derail your thread than spammning pics of porn stars or whatever
Why ? Well, why not ? Internet is full of weird people. Don't wind up on stuff like this.
Originally posted by PhantomLimb
Originally posted by Spotless
reply to post by impaired
I'm pretty sure the government could think of something better on how to derail your thread than spammning pics of porn stars or whatever
Why ? Well, why not ? Internet is full of weird people. Don't wind up on stuff like this.
I just opened up 15 tabs so I could look at all 15 pics at once...
what were we talking about?
Originally posted by AshleyD
Crisis averted.
Let's get back on topic now please.
Apologies for the nuisance.
Originally posted by zilebeliveunknown
Ladies and gentlemen,
introducing you the first capture of fossil on planet mars, spine and rebs included.(scroll to right)
Reference image
Originally posted by flexy123
Well, it's clear for me:
You guys found evidence for life on Mars, not only one life-form, but TONS, in that picture alone.
Now NASA is panicking, "pulling" the images as fast as they can before the knowledge becomes public.
I bet NASA was really busy to erase all the evidence the last few days (where the rover had the, COUGH "firmware update", COUGH)...in reality, they were SHOCKED by all the findings and it took them 3-4 days to go through all the images to "correct" them and re-upload them on their site.
edit on 16-8-2012 by flexy123 because: (no reason given)