Dr. Salvatore Conti = Actor Frank Vidal

reply to post by Swills


Is it unreasonable to think there might be a significant time period between shooting the first video and the second?

Is it therefore unreasonable to think that in the second video, a man that has aged has lost a lot of hair, and is balding considerably?

Cheezus people, and especially that one person still doubting...

We already established yesterday it's the same person. You can even see the MOLE on that other video, slightly touched up with make-up.

There is NOTHING to argue anymore, seriously.

reply to post by Swills


What this,

What's funny is Franks recent YT comments are all accusations he is Dr. Sal . Frank and friends are all like

Do you expect them to admit it, if it is him?

Or this,

Yeah I'm going with NO they are NOT the same person. Now this opinion is based off a quick judgement call but the actor, Frank, does look similar to the other bald white guy but my guess is Frank was not born in 1949 but more importantly Frank is clearly younger than our Dr. Sal.

Time difference of years between the vids, make up?

I love you too buddy.

reply to post by toolgal462


Very obvious he has a real mole on his cheek? Like I've said in this thread, I have a simialar mole myself that I guess you would call fake for all the reasons you've just listed. Why is this so obvious to you? Not I that I believe the mole is there to cover up a scar or something, but my question to you is where is the scar in the older Frank videos?

Also, see my edited post above yours about a poster who posted their movie biz experience

reply to post by AmatuerSkyWatcher


No it's not and I even brought that up in one of my many posts in this thread. In my opinion for that to be the case then the Frank videos have to be around 10 years old, or more, than the current Dr. Sal video. Problem is we don't have dates on the Frank videos, unless the YT upload is close to accurate. The easiest way to find out is to find more info about Frank Vidal. How hard can that be? An actor on the internet? Granted, he's not what I would call a real actor, but still, all actors need exposure.

reply to post by flexy123


We actually covered that already, without the help of the other thread. I also asked for an analysis of the other Frank video, which I dunno if that's been done yet. Maybe you can tell me?

reply to post by Swills


But the scar/mole IS THERE in the older video. You can see it clearly if you are looking for it. Maybe you need to go back and check the picture that has the 2 images matched up one on top of the other?
The mole matches EXACTLY.....
I am going to explain this one more time. In the earlier videos, he was either hiding the mole with makeup OR it could be a scar that left an indent in the exact same place where the mole shows up in the Sal Conti video.
And in the Sal Conti video, he has absolutely accentuated the mole (or scar) with makeup, no doubt about it. He thinks he is Cindy Crawford or Marilyn Monroe

Btw, does anyone know who was the first person on the internet that found out about this guy, and how they found out about him?

reply to post by Swills


You just answered the question as to WHY Frank Vidal did this....For exposure...

He is just LOVING you swills.....You have given him hope, that he is a GREAT actor!!!

reply to post by Swills


Swills, it IS definitely the same guy.

No doubt about it. Even has the same very slight squint. (hard to notice, but compare the videos)

Facial structure is the same, voice is the same...he's the same guy.

While I'll admit it was intellectually interesting to ponder the scenario presented in the 'Dr. Sal' video, what if this guy had convinced the wrong person or people the world WAS actually about to end? What if the fragile mind of the guy or gal he'd convinced decided to take him or herself out early and decided their family would be spared pain if they went along too...?

There's a very serious side to hoaxing this sort of 'pain and suffering, end of the world crap'...however much most of us think it weak, there are all sorts in this world who might have come to harm if they'd believed this hook and line.

There ought to be a law against deliberate hoaxing of this sort. Unless there is a disclaimer stating 'fiction for entertainment purposes', these irresponsible jerks should be up before the judge for reckless endangerment.

reply to post by toolgal462


I'm familiar with the one pic from Franks second video that people claim is a covered up mole or a scar, but that doesn't mean it is. We have another video of Franks, pix and all, that hasn't been examined yet. One pic taken from a video clip is not solid evidence. It's something, but not concrete. And as I've said, what actor doesn't have face shots and other works online? Has anyone found this man's website . Once that happens, this'll will all be easier.

Originally posted by toolgal462
reply to post by Swills

 

You just answered the question as to WHY Frank Vidal did this....For exposure...

He is just LOVING you swills.....You have given him hope, that he is a GREAT actor!!!

You make a great point but are wrong about who he is loving, because it aint me.

And for now I'm leaving this thread/ATS but I will be back tomorrow. Peace out.

reply to post by LAUGHING-CAT


Devils advocate here, he did say he was in a top secret program even other NASA members didn't know about, so one would expect it to not be in the books.

OMG people and sheeple...

Don't blame the actor..how about you start researching WHO hired him and why. That guy is only a fricking actor, he got paid for this, it's his job.

reply to post by flexy123


Any bright ideas on how to do so?

reply to post by flexy123

Meh...doubt he was paid...He's just trying to get people to watch his videos. Maybe he's got a friend who wrote that script and they are in it together to see how it flies.
But I doubt it's anything more than that.

reply to post by toolgal462


Lol, if that is the case, all he has proven is that he is a bad actor.

But that thought did cross my mind.

reply to post by flexy123


I'd certainly blame the actor if someone i loved topped themselves because they believed his performance.

Extreme example i know, but It's a bit like saying 'don't blame the camp guards, they were just following orders'.

Hypothetically, If people died as a result of believing the 'end of the world video by Dr. Sal' this guy, and yes his employers, will bear the responsibility equally. I'd say that makes it reasonable to blame the 'actor' regardless of who paid him to act the lines.

reply to post by MightyPenfriend


Well, of course he is a bad actor or else he wouldn't have to resort to such foolishness to be noticed!
ON the other hand, he has clearly gotten better over the years. LOL That serial killer monologue was simply painful to watch....Like watching paint dry...

AT least Sali Conti had me somewhat intrigued, so that is progress!

I was under the same impression as everyone else, the guy sounded like he knew what he was talking about, but I was still on the fence. That's definitely Frank. I'm not mad that its fake, what I'm more pissed about is the lengths that people are going through just TO fake # like this.

Just give them a few more years and they'll be able to put up a video of you doing something that you didn't even do and be able to convict you for it.

reply to post by MysterX


You have a relevant point, remember Heaven's Gate? People are gullible....