It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
As far as JFK being assassinated, it was an inside job.
* After the "Bay of Pigs" failure, Kennedy had fired CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell.
* Kennedy also made the statement that he would "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds."
* Kennedy had also stripped the CIA of responsibility for paramilitary operations like the "Bay of Pigs" and turned them over to the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
* Following presentation of the "Operation Northwoods" plan, Kennedy removed General Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
* American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the Cuban Missile Crisis.
(Sources)
President Kennedy was absolutely against the military industrial complex, and he made it known that it wasn't a secret. The military/CIA "perceived" that President Kennedy was a national security risk and took him out. As a result, the military industrial complex now controls the U.S. and it's foreign policies around the world to this day.
Originally posted by ConspiracyBuff
Disregard how JFK was killed its moot.
Instead focus on why he was killed:
Exectutive Order 11110
Vietnam
Dissolving the CIA
This speech
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
James Fetzer also believes that no planes hit the towers on 9/11 and that all the videos of planes hitting the towers were faked, and that all the witnesses who saw planes are lying and/or possibly saw holograms.
Fetzer's assertions are a known HOAX and have been proven as such for years now.
Since Fetzer continues to perpetrate the HOAX that is "no-planes on 9/11", how can anything else he says be taken seriously?
www.popsci.com...
Found: The Particular Brain Fold That Helps People Distinguish Between Imagination and Reality
Originally posted by trysts
Just my opinion, MagnumOpus, but I don't think there were two shots to the head. The video above is not convincing to me at all. I see one shot to the head in the Zapruder film.
Originally posted by MagnumOpus
Originally posted by trysts
Just my opinion, MagnumOpus, but I don't think there were two shots to the head. The video above is not convincing to me at all. I see one shot to the head in the Zapruder film.
It is hard to see without the frame to frame closer look. This little gif shows the head movement forward with the right temple eruption. The energy of the first bullet hitting from behind imparts the forward impulse motion. The rear of JFK's head is fine in this gif sequence:
But what most people watching Zapruder see is the larger of the motion from the second shot hitting from the right front:
Then in the last frames for this gif one sees the bulge at the rear of JFK's head from that impact forcing brain material rearward and under the scalp. It shows up better with the magnification of the frame done with Bob Harris You Tube video.
Using the frame by frame views, one sees two different motions for JFK's head due to shots from two separate directions imparting the motion of the directions of the bullets.
I don't know if that helps you see the details better, but that is what the Zapruder Film's motion anaysis shows.
edit on 11-8-2012 by MagnumOpus because: Real Physics applied to Assassination
Originally posted by trysts
Well, that was really hard to view for me, MagnumOpus, but thank you for finding and posting it. I still don't see two shots to the head. Thanks for your effort though!
Originally posted by patrick1000
reply to post by MagnumOpus
I think as is the case with garden variety conspiracies, the key to coming to terms with theJfk tragedy. Is to look at context. In this case, context is johnson. There you have it. Problemo solved.
Originally posted by patrick1000
reply to post by MagnumOpus
Is the zaprudeer film authentic?
Originally posted by patrick1000
reply to post by MagnumOpus
My take on something like the Zapruder film is that it cannot be authentic. By that I mean, things like this that they want us to see must have been altered, tampered with and so forth, so that we are. Lead to the bad guys version of things.