It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Tarantino supposing ran a stop sign. A passing cop pulled a u-turn, flashed the lights, and rolled up behind her. Tarantino claims that the cop immediately drew his weapon, pulled her from the car, and refused to explain why he pulled her over. Tarantino's two young children watched all of this unfold from inside her car.
The cop then placed Tarantino in the back of the squad car, where she allegedly sat for two hours. When backup arrived, Tarantino was strip searched on the side of the road, where passing motorists could see everything.
Then, in a gruesome twist, a female officer "forcibly removed" a tampon from Tarantino.Presumably, the cops were looking for drugs, but the lawsuit notes that a drug-sniffing dog was never called in, and cops never found any contraband or anything illegal.
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
sadly it is the new America, until enough people decide they are sick and tired of being sick and tired.
Originally posted by dashen
No amount of money can repay this, nor jail time. The officers should be subjected to the same "treatment".
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
sadly it is the new America, until enough people decide they are sick and tired of being sick and tired.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
You are now guilty until proven innocent and your 4th amendment rights no longer mater.
Originally posted by DaRAGE
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
sadly it is the new America, until enough people decide they are sick and tired of being sick and tired.
Honestly, I'm just waiting for the police to pull this shiot off on the wrong person and the police who violate this persons rights end up getting whacked off at home in the middle of the night. Not only will they piss off the wrong person, but it will be the wrong person with major connections...
Originally posted by yeahright
Originally posted by camaro68ss
You are now guilty until proven innocent and your 4th amendment rights no longer mater.
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Does the outrage also apply when the accused are law enforcement officers?
What we have here is a report of a lawsuit that was filed due to an incident that allegedly occurred a year ago in July, 2011. At this point, we've heard one side.
It would be nice if we could extend the same courtesy of assumption of innocence to LEOs, at least until more info is available beyond what's provided by a lawyer who's looking to ugly this up as much as possible in order to collect.
I think I'll withhold judgement until additional information is available.
Just my opinion.
As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Originally posted by yeahright
I think I'll withhold judgement until additional information is available.