It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
t was more than two decades ago that the first web page launched, and if you're curious what the web looked like back in 1991, CERN has preserved that original site for your perusing pleasure. Created by Tim Berners-Lee on a NeXT computer, the site was a place to find information about the new and exciting World Wide Web — "a wide-area hypermedia information retrieval initiative aiming to give universal access to a large universe of documents," as it was described.
The preserved version has been around for some time, but isn't an exact replica, however. CERN says that it's a copy from 1992, and that "changes were made daily to the information available on the page as the WWW project developed." Sadly no screenshots exist of the original page. Still, while it's lacking in modern features like, say, images, it's a nice reminder of how much the web has grown in a relatively short time, and a great example of preservation in the digital age.
Actually there's nothing really too wrong with it. Except for a few missing quotation marks around attribute values I can't really see too much else wrong with it...
Originally posted by SpearMint
Wow, horribly invalid HTML now but what do you expect. Pretty cool, we've come a long way.
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Actually there's nothing really too wrong with it. Except for a few missing quotation marks around attribute values I can't really see too much else wrong with it...
Originally posted by SpearMint
Wow, horribly invalid HTML now but what do you expect. Pretty cool, we've come a long way.
The fact that the tags are capitalized really doesn't matter, that's still valid HTML. The fact that tags and attributes have been spread over multiple lines is perfectly allowed, HTML isn't a line by line language. The fact that it uses some weird tags means nothing because those tags were probably perfectly valid at the time in the browser being used to interpret the HTML.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Actually there's nothing really too wrong with it. Except for a few missing quotation marks around attribute values I can't really see too much else wrong with it...
Originally posted by SpearMint
Wow, horribly invalid HTML now but what do you expect. Pretty cool, we've come a long way.
There's a lot wrong with it by today's standards.edit on 9-8-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpearMint
Wow, horribly invalid HTML now but what do you expect. Pretty cool, we've come a long way.
Google in 1996edit on 9-8-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
wouldnt we need a crt monitor to really be viewd correctly? ^^ as in green and black, or orange and black on some 8o)
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
The fact that the tags are capitalized really doesn't matter, that's still valid HTML. The fact that tags and attributes have been spread over multiple lines is perfectly allowed, HTML isn't a line by line language. The fact that it uses some weird tags means nothing because those tags were probably perfectly valid at the time in the browser being used to interpret the HTML.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by ChaoticOrder
Actually there's nothing really too wrong with it. Except for a few missing quotation marks around attribute values I can't really see too much else wrong with it...
Originally posted by SpearMint
Wow, horribly invalid HTML now but what do you expect. Pretty cool, we've come a long way.
There's a lot wrong with it by today's standards.edit on 9-8-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)edit on 9/8/2012 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)