It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jeantherapy
reply to post by dogstar23
You are comparing children to dogs, not I. What I've said is this again, just for you: Humans created domesticated dogs, you stated they evolved that way as a result of natural selection. Wrong. The dog breeds we have today are the direct result of human actions; if humans did not exist neither would these dogs - just wolves, coyotes, etc as it was before. If I program a robot to act as if it loves me, and I believe it really loves me what is the difference? In my firsthand contact most dogs will latch onto whoever is spending the time with them and feeding them. Is that love, or is the dog responding to its training, in that it wants food and will do what's necessary to acquire it?
its really not that great
Originally posted by jeantherapy
Originally posted by PlantGirl
I once read somewhere a quote that goes something like: "If you haven't known the love of an animal, you haven't truly known love." I'm sure I shredded the quote, but you get the gist.
This photo is remarkable. Thanks, OP, for sharing.
They've been bred over thousands of years to love us. Wild animals do not love us, only captive animals who are forced to provide affection. Even humans, it's called Stockholm Syndrome.
Originally posted by CrippledAhole
true pets are not pets but family members.
Originally posted by jeantherapy
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Of course this is true but the fact remains that these dogs were engineered to be what they are by humans. Wolves, so far as I have uncovered, do not seem to enjoy these same feelings.
Originally posted by Elentarri
To all those posters who think dogs love people because they have been bred for it - that is non-sense.
In our family we have had about 10 german shepherds over the years and know a great deal more GSD (through the training clubs etc). Every single one of those dogs had different personalities. Even dogs from the same litter. Some of our dogs have been velcro dogs, others have like human contact but not too much, most like tummy rubs, some didn't, most will eat the dog food provided, a few have stuck their noses up in the air, some will go catch pigeons and some will share breakfast with the birds.
My sister's latest 10 month old GSD has no interest in pleasing humans. As far as this dog is concerned, humans are there to provide food (human optional, dog will happily try to eat whatever drives, rides, walks, flies or crawls past her nose); take her for walkies (human not required, just an open gate); take her for training (so she can bite people) and blow bubbles for her. She isn't interested in cuddles or tummy rubs or any of that stuff.
One of our GSD will turn his head away and stare into space when you tell him to go out of the kitchen, like a delinquent 2 year old that pretends not to hear you. Our ancient GSD will look guilty as sin when you walk in the house and you know he has been sleeping on the bed which is supposed to be off-limits for dogs. All 3 of my sisters GSD understand that when at her place they can sleep/ sit on the couch and bed but when they get dropped off at my parents for holidays that they are not allowed on the furniture.
So you see, some of our dogs love us, some more than others, and some of them find us useful for opening tins and gates and providing things to chew on can probably manage perfectly fine without us. Dogs have personalities, intelligence and are perfectly capable of loving their people.
Originally posted by jeantherapy
This inexplicable need to have animals 'love' us reminds me of Jenna Maroney on 30 Rock, who needs constant attention and to be told she's beautiful else her life ceases to have meaning. The lion video is interesting but that lion was raised from a cub - it wasn't a fully wild animal. I am also entertained by the antics of Shaun Ellis, whose career I've followed for some time - I like his work in Poland, but I am not convinced his experience with wild wolves proves their love for humans. They tolerated him but was it out of curiosity? As humans we terrorize the planet, and yet here we are demanding love from wild animals? I know that as humans we are not worthy of this love, considering what we are doing to the planet (which is the home to all these animals I love dearly, a one sided love)
Originally posted by jeantherapy
How are personal attacks advancing your case? I haven't made inflammatory comments about any one person, how can you hope to embarrass me by doing so? I've seen many dog owners send a misbehaving dog to the kennel (cage). If it is demeaning to put a man in a cage why is it not so with other creatures? And I've held off when it comes to making comments about what these loving owners do to pets' genitals, which brings to my mind images of concentration camp atrocities. What would happen if a dog could associate its owner with the loss of its dignity?
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
You seem to have a HUGE amount of anger. In an attempt to understand, can you please explain your sociapathy/psycopathy?
Also, I do not see sending a man into a cage (as you say) demeaning. He/She/It, made thier way there all by themselves (and some of them need to be forcibly sterilized as well).
I await your response.