It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When you say your idea is to be born again are you speaking of baptism?
Originally posted by skepticconwatcher
reply to post by MamaJ
In this passage I think it actually does refer to Jesus when it mentions "his visitation" Jesus is Christ come in the flesh. What I found interesting was the part where the good and evil are still here but that the Holy Spirit will protect us from the evil spirit.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
My aim in presenting this text is to allow anyone to verify what is presented by scripture. Also, if any points can be denied, free free to list scripture as your reasoning. Please keep opinions to a minimum and simply approve or deny from a biblical perspective.
Originally posted by lambs to lions
reply to post by AnIntellectualRedneck
This is why it is up to God alone to cast final judgement. We are all too heavily flawed.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by MamaJ
When you say your idea is to be born again are you speaking of baptism?
Baptism by Water is the physical manifestation of the spiritual commitment. Baptism by Fire is what saves you, this is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit (Ruach ha'Kodesh) you recieve in your salvation experience, the nature of your spirit is changed. Baptism by Fire burns away the spirit that inhabited you before you were born again.
Satan mocked this process using the demon Molech to which some of the ancients, both Canaanite and the Israelite idolaters (Solomon) would cause their children to pass through the fire (human sacrifice for prosperity).
Above is a picture depicting this mockery of the salvation experience.edit on 10-8-2012 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MamaJ
I believe we reincarnate until we have reached spiritual evolution. I think God is outside of time whereas we dont have a " time limit" when there will be some huge judgement day where he sentences us to heaven or hell...
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
My aim in presenting this text is to allow anyone to verify what is presented by scripture. Also, if any points can be denied, free free to list scripture as your reasoning. Please keep opinions to a minimum and simply approve or deny from a biblical perspective.
Wow.
Isn't that kind of like "verifying" the existence of Santa Claus by evaluating the lyrics of Christmas carols? Or maybe it's more like asking people for a consensus interpretation of the morality of Sharia law and prohibit anyone to draw from any other sources other than the Koran.
Wouldn't peoples "conclusions" be pretty obvious since you've rigged the debate before it even started? You've eliminated room for dissent with your plea to "keep opinions to a minimum" and ask people only to approve or deny something based upon texts from a single source which all start out with the presupposition of a single ideologies inherent and indisputable veracity and superiority.
I'm gathering you are really more interested in simply finding people to validate what you already believe to be true, rather than actually wanting to ask a legitimate question in hopes of receiving a legitimate answer. Am I correct?
Originally posted by EddieCusak
reply to post by EnochWasRight
I can't get my head around the idea that "Jesus died for our sins"... In what sense did he?
Baptism by Fire", huh?
...and we wonder why we use to burn so many innocent women alive for being "witches". With rhetoric like that, it's amazing we still aren't doing so.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by MamaJ
When you say your idea is to be born again are you speaking of baptism?
Baptism by Water is the physical manifestation of the spiritual commitment. Baptism by Fire is what saves you, this is the Baptism of the Holy Spirit (Ruach ha'Kodesh) you recieve in your salvation experience, the nature of your spirit is changed. Baptism by Fire burns away the spirit that inhabited you before you were born again.
Satan mocked this process using the demon Molech to which some of the ancients, both Canaanite and the Israelite idolaters (Solomon) would cause their children to pass through the fire (human sacrifice for prosperity).
Above is a picture depicting this mockery of the salvation experience.edit on 10-8-2012 by lonewolf19792000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LuFri
reply to post by EnochWasRight
"Revelation 1:7
7 “Look, he is coming with the clouds,”
and “every eye will see him,
even those who pierced him”;
and all peoples on earth “will mourn because of him.”
So shall it be! Amen. "
What do you think coming with the clouds refers to?
What Bible translation do you use?
Thank you for taking the time to post all of this!
Originally posted by LuFri
reply to post by EnochWasRight
"Revelation 1:7
7 “Look, he is coming with the clouds,”
and “every eye will see him,
even those who pierced him”;
and all peoples on earth “will mourn because of him.”
So shall it be! Amen. "
What do you think coming with the clouds refers to?
What Bible translation do you use?
Thank you for taking the time to post all of this!
Originally posted by EddieCusak
reply to post by EnochWasRight
I can't get my head around the idea that "Jesus died for our sins"... In what sense did he?
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
Who is more a Son of Light: the child molesting Catholic priests or the Atheists who get out there and try to make the world a better place?
Who is more a Son of Darkness: a Pagan who tries to fill the lives of others with love or the people from Westboro Baptist?
What if perversity is not what you think and wickedness is not what you dream?
You are constructing your own premise apart from other context and comparisons. The Priest is what Jesus condemned as the High Priest. He also condemned Peter by saying, "Get behind me Satan." Peter denies Christ three times. Jesus says this to Peter:
Matthew 16:18
18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter (Petros), and upon this rock (Petra) I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Petros is a small stone that is moved. It's the same stone that was rolled away to reveal Christ. Who is the Church built on, ROME? No. It's built on the foundation stone (PETRA). That's Christ. Jesus also condemned the Builders for rejecting the chief cornerstone. The Builders and the Masons. The NWO is built on the movable foundation of the Mystery School Religion and Babylon. Jesus also condemned the moneychangers and turned over their tables. A table is a financial balance sheet. Are the tables turned today? That system of Babylon will be destroyed soon. Peter and the church of Rome have always been the harlot. I can discount your premise immediately on this shaky foundation. This is not to say that there are not many good Christian Catholics. There are.
The second premise is that a Pagan can fill anyone with truth. The Mystery School Religion is based on taking rather than giving. It's built on the will to take rather than the will to receive from God or the will to give to others. Duplicity is seeking God for reward. What is really desired? Duplicity is seeking God to avoid judgment. What is truly desired? Paganism is built around the selfishness of the inner desires for power and wealth. This can only take from others. True Christian faith is built on good for its own sake. The will to receive from God is then paid forward by the will to give to others above self. You can only find this narrow path in one place.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Asclepius is scripture on the side of the Mystery Religion. Feel free. Fry up some Hermetic Bacon if you want. The Rosecutions have plenty of scripture and references. I'll stick to the Bible, but we may as well use any scripture or even a movie or two. The symbolism will be the same.
Originally posted by milominderbinder
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
My aim in presenting this text is to allow anyone to verify what is presented by scripture. Also, if any points can be denied, free free to list scripture as your reasoning. Please keep opinions to a minimum and simply approve or deny from a biblical perspective.
Wow.
Isn't that kind of like "verifying" the existence of Santa Claus by evaluating the lyrics of Christmas carols? Or maybe it's more like asking people for a consensus interpretation of the morality of Sharia law and prohibit anyone to draw from any other sources other than the Koran.
Wouldn't peoples "conclusions" be pretty obvious since you've rigged the debate before it even started? You've eliminated room for dissent with your plea to "keep opinions to a minimum" and ask people only to approve or deny something based upon texts from a single source which all start out with the presupposition of a single ideologies inherent and indisputable veracity and superiority.
I'm gathering you are really more interested in simply finding people to validate what you already believe to be true, rather than actually wanting to ask a legitimate question in hopes of receiving a legitimate answer. Am I correct?