It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mikesingh
I've read somewhere that our Moon is hollow! Convincing arguments have been put forth including one that says that probably it is a huge artificial satellite put into orbit by a civilization millions of years ago! Wow! That sounds like hard core science fiction. But perhaps could it be true.....?? Looking for answers!!
[edit on 11-10-2004 by mikesingh]
Originally posted by kinglizard
You may get some information from the following threads.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Cyborgwitch
Wasn't one of Mars' moons also supposed to be hollow, or in any case extremely light? Think it was Phobos, I'm not sure, though.
Originally posted by NaturalManiac
Originally posted by Cyborgwitch
Wasn't one of Mars' moons also supposed to be hollow, or in any case extremely light? Think it was Phobos, I'm not sure, though.
Yeah, I recognize that as well. I even think it was Carl Sagan and a russian scientist who proposed that idea though I might remember wrong.
Originally posted by Byrd
Originally posted by NaturalManiac
Originally posted by Cyborgwitch
Wasn't one of Mars' moons also supposed to be hollow, or in any case extremely light? Think it was Phobos, I'm not sure, though.
Yeah, I recognize that as well. I even think it was Carl Sagan and a russian scientist who proposed that idea though I might remember wrong.
Uhm... no, it's not extremely light and no, Sagan didn't propose that. I don't think it has any support at all in the scientific community. I've seen it as the "plot" of some fiction but no credible evidence.
Originally posted by sardion2000
Actually Byrd, an astronomer some 60 years ago proposed the idea that Mars's moon(s? how many moons does mars have??) might be artificial because they were much too light. Then the same guy debunked his own theory a couple years later, after checking his results. I think it was an error in his calculations/observations. Forget his name though... couldn't have been Sagan though...