It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What parts of the New Agers beliefs do you find lacking in evidence/contradictory to existing evidence?
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
What parts of the New Agers beliefs do you find lacking in evidence/contradictory to existing evidence?
All of it, if i was to make a startiing point in the trial of evidence id say start with the 6 oclock news. Well of course thats one facet of the evidence at hand. Where is the Sunshine, all feedback is positive on the path of truth.
Originally posted by NeoVain
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
What parts of the New Agers beliefs do you find lacking in evidence/contradictory to existing evidence?
All of it, if i was to make a startiing point in the trial of evidence id say start with the 6 oclock news. Well of course thats one facet of the evidence at hand. Where is the Sunshine, all feedback is positive on the path of truth.
Well we are still in the age of pisces last i checked... that may explain the 6' oclock news you are referring to...
www.librarising.com...edit on 7-8-2012 by NeoVain because: (no reason given)
Age of Aquarius was pop culture fluff aimed at suburbanites who were hippy wannabees.
Originally posted by NeoVain
reply to post by AthlonSavage
What parts of the New Agers beliefs do you find lacking in evidence/contradictory to existing evidence? If all you know about their beliefs is some song from the 60s, i feel it would be wiser to start diggin into the existing material rather than so willingly show your ignorance on a site whose motto is "deny ignorance".
There are some pretty good reasons and lots of ancient astrological evidence for their beliefs if you start digging into ancient civilizations etc, i myself had not even heard of the song you mentioned, and i cannot find it on youtube... got any link?
he New Age movement is a Western spiritual movement that developed in the second half of the 20th century. Its central precepts have been described as "drawing on both Eastern and Western spiritual and metaphysical traditions and infusing them with influences from self-help and motivational psychology, holistic health, parapsychology, consciousness research and quantum physics".
It aims to create "a spirituality without borders or confining dogmas" that is inclusive and pluralistic. It holds to "a holistic worldview," emphasising that the Mind, Body and Spirit are interrelated and that there is a form of Monism and unity throughout the universe. It attempts to create "a worldview that includes both science and spirituality" and embraces a number of forms of mainstream science as well as other forms of science that are considered fringe.
According to author Nevill Drury, the origins of the movement can be found in the 18th and 19th centuries, particularly through the works of the esotericists Emanuel Swedenborg, Franz Mesmer, Helena Blavatsky and George Gurdjieff, who laid some of the basic philosophical principles that would influence the movement. It would gain further momentum in the 1960s, taking influence from metaphysics, self-help psychology, and the various Indian gurus who visited the West during that decade.
reply to post by autowrench
I even got a short and small preview of it a few years ago sitting in my easy chair at home. I raised up to a standing position and then sat back down, suddenly realizing that I had not taken my body with me when I rose. I then stood again, and this time turned slightly, and caught a glimpse of my leg and arm in the chair. I sat back down, it was if some force was making this happen. The last time i stood, I slowly turned and saw my human body sitting there, seemingly asleep, relaxed, and breathing steadily.