It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GeorgeHunt
New York is the land of the Jews. A politician once called it "Hymie-Town". Bloomberg, Silverstein, Geithner, Scharia (UN) and others in our daily press are actually conspiring against We the People to eventually bring the United States to our knees through lies, deceit and corruption in the Treasury and the Federal Reserve..
Nothing against the Jews, of course; I am a Jew.
Originally posted by TechUnique
Originally posted by Mkoll
But New York was not founded by York rite masons. It was originally New Amsterdam and it was founded to exploit the local beaver pelts. It was later the capital of the Dutch colony of New Netherlands. New Netherlands was taken by the British in the second Anglo Dutch war and remade as New York.edit on 4-8-2012 by Mkoll because: (no reason given)
So it was taken by the British as you say? What's to say it wasn't British Masons as Icke suggests?..
Originally posted by ForkandSpoon
I think there's a huge misconception here about the Masonic members on ATS, and the Non Masonic members who defend us. Also about those who roll their eyes when you talk about "Illuminati" and how people are just to stubborn to believe you.
1.) The majority of Masons here likely do beleive in conspiracies.
2.) It's not that we don't beleive such groups exist, it's often that quite frankly we're better versed on the subject and our own history, and didn't just discover the possibility of conspiracies on the "interwebs"! We're not trying to throw you off from thinking something is going on, if you would just pay attention you just might learn something, we're often trying to help give you some insight if you would stop freaking out and pay attention.
3.) the Non masons here who defend us or also ar skeptical of your theories, are not apart of some "conspiracy" with us....rather they have become educated on the subject, and have read multiple conspiracies from the plausable to the fantastical and learned to filter some of the rubbish....
4.) It's not that we disagree with the "concept" of the "illuminati" we just disagree with you CALLING them the Illuminati...because that group is a historical group, that did exist, and it is NOT a common view that they are identical group to the modern groups today among those who seriously study this.
5.) Correcting you about relating groups doesn't always mean we don't think there is a connection, but rather we think your regurgitated connection is false, because we already researchd it, and it may be a false front that hides the real one....
6.) All of history shows various groups competing for power.....how is it you think all of such groups suddenly became on the same page? Again if you say the COFR, COR, FREEMASONS, WHITE LOTUS, JESUITS, MORMONS, JUSTIN BIEBER FANS, ACLU, are all apart of the NWO/ILLUMINATI AND are out to get us!!! if we laugh at that, or mock it, or just disagree, it's not that we don;t think there's some truth in there or that there is possibly a conspiracy, it's that we disagree that all those groups are doing so, and we certainly disagree they're working together, and evidence wise more then a few seem to be at war with each other. Don't mistake our cringe for trying to invalidate ANY conspiracy....just your conspiracy, which while NEW to you, is often one we have read about decades ago that was partially debunked or showed sloppy research.
Are thre conspiracies? YES. Should you be concerned? YES. Are there relationships between some of these groups? YES. Does Justin Beiber mean you harm? YE....well I think so anyway. But there is not some simplistic all ecompassing theory that fits them together in neat crayola colorbook format. It's complicated, we're talking sophisticated cold war cloak and dagger complicated. Where nothing is as it appears, false fronts rise and fall, disinformation campaigns confuse it so much that even those waging the campaigns become confused....and you walk in here clearly not well read, grab the first 30 to 200 year old debunked theory that is new to you and get upset when we don't thank you for revealing to us in total clarity some truth.....you swager in the newest convert to whatever theory you found and skimmed, and wonder why we roll our eyes....we here being ALL of those on the board who have done serious research from various backgrounds.....pay attention.... many here you find frustrating might just be able to help your understanding if you would calm down, and use reason and logic, and common sense, and consider a library card.edit on 18/8/2012 by ForkandSpoon because: grammer
Originally posted by trag3dy
I dont get it...If they want to create a utopia where everyone is connected and we theres no more war...then what is so bad about this plan?
Originally posted by magickmaster
Ahhh....if there is one single thing the Masons are good at besides world domination, it's the art of distraction. Call it "sleight of hand" if you will, but it's the oldest Magicians trick in the book. If you watch what my left hand is doing, my right hand will be free to slap you upside the head.
Originally posted by magickmaster
You are presupposing that everyone who answers here, in the name of masons, are educated like yourself.
You cannot assume that the other Masons are half intelligent just because you are, and you are expecting us to believe you (when you constantly spell believe incorrectly) regarding what other Masons are teaching or are ignorant of. Not everyone here is stupid enough to buy that.
Originally posted by magickmaster
Of course, it's mixed in with typical laughable material like the Justin Bieber jabs, so as to add the air of laughability to the whole argument itself.
Originally posted by magickmaster
If you are a Mason and you are not honestly apologetic about the behavior of your brethren, you are no more an evolved human being than a eanderthal or cro-magnon. Instead you should be begging for forgiveness and accptance from the world at large, for your disastrous rule for so long
Originally posted by Agoyahtah
Well, in Scotland it certainly wasn't called "Scottish Rite". It might have been the "Rite of Perfection" or some such thing, I can't remember exactly. But, it's understandable that the French would add the appellation "Scottish" because it was a Rite "foreign" to their ways, and they simply attributed an origin to the Rite, having known from whence it came. They could have said "English Rite", but they didn't. Logic suggests that the origin is as the name implies, or else someone sought to enter some confusion into Freemasonry.
then before leaving office, signs into law a secret Telecommunications Bill requiring the switch-over of all Federal and Bank phone lines to Fiber Optic for the purpose of electronic funds transfer as required by law in the year 2000 when cash and checks will be no longer legal.