It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by drbatstein
Sorry what was I thinking,
It would seem I posted a few days early
Nothing will happen, if it does it will have nothing to do with numerology and everything to do with say a horrible natural disaster or some terrorists, might be some other type of tragedy that will have nothing to do with the fictitious NWO.
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by drbatstein
Yes I accept that something might happen, just like I accept that something might happen tomorrow it might happen but it has nothing to do with your silly numbers and conspiracy theories about the all-powerful super villains of the NWO. Bad things happen because bad things happen, a hundred years ago we had earthquakes and hurricanes that had nothing to do with the HAARP terrorists attack us because they wish to do us harm, it has nothing to do with your Orwellian fantasies.
And I must as on what day of the year would you accept a disaster to occur on that won’t be in some way significant to the NWO and connected to numerology in some way?
In addition to this Can you please tell me of one terrorist incident in the last decade that you do not believe was connected to the NWO in any way
What you are a perfect example of is what a psychologist would call “confirmation bias”, you have already decided that you believe in numerology and as such you will only seek out evidence to confirm this believe in bias even when there is no real evidence to support it other than you own logic and the bias of the evidence you reference. you have chosen to go with the number 7, 7 days before the Olympics, 7 days after the start of the Olympics and 7 dead (could end up being more but let’s ignore that for a moment). All you have is the number 7 being repeated 3 times but in different ways, this is not even a coincidence in my view. But when viewed with your confirmation bias this turns into something significant because you are seeing what you want to see. Other than the number 7 you have got nothing, you can’t even say what this is part of, why it happened, where the other connections are or even provide us with any proof other than the number 7 that there events are connected.
The president of the temple, Satwant Singh Kaleka, was preparing to deliver remarks when he became one of the shooting victims. His son, Amardeep Kaleka, spoke by phone with ABC News' David Muir
Dr. Steven Greer has teamed up with Emmy Award winning filmmaker Amardeep Kaleka (www.neverendinglight.com). Together, they will produce the Disclosure documentary that will connect the dots and rock the world.
Then as a psychologist surly you can understand why one might say your beliefs are formed form a confirmation bias and the fact that you have spent 20 years studying numerology would only compound this view. Can you provide me with one shred of evidence that there is anything more than a bunch of coincidences to this whole numerology stuff. Because let me tell you, I can find a significant number to associate with anything I want and at the end of the day all I will have is a number, no facts and no meaning. And out of curiosity are you a actual psychologist, as in do you have a university degree in psychology
Originally posted by coyotepoet
Yes I can understand that as much as I can understand that cognitive dissonance might keep you from seeing it as anything more than just coincidence.
Originally posted by coyotepoet
reply to post by MaxBlack
Since today, August 5, happens to be exactly 7 days from August 12 and the closing ceremony, I am certain this serves an example of the 7 day rule that leads us to London.
Yep. Has to be a coincidence. A mass shooting in Colorado exactly 7 days before the Opening Ceremony and another one in Wisconsin exactly 7 days before the closing ceremony where 6+1 (gunman) were killed. Nah! Nothing to see here. Go back to sleep.
The numerology will only tell you when the event will fall, but not the exact details of the event. One can only speculate which type of attack it will be, obviously the guy got the date right using numerology, then speculated as to what would happen and got the speculation bit wrong.
I predict that something significant will happen on November 14th 2014. That's 14/11 - or 11/14 as Americans prefer. Add all the digits = 7 Add the digits of 2014 = 7
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by coyotepoet
Well, as accuracy isn't actually a requirement, it seems ok to accept that an earthquake in Haiti is proof of the accuracy of a numerology prediction of a killer virus, so if that is the standard we are judging by then I will now use the classic tactic of those whose predictions are disproved by shifting the goalposts and saying that I was incorrect in my initial calculations and the date will actually be November 16th 2014.
......but we must focus on the known dates of attack, like the 10th August 2012
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by drbatstein
......but we must focus on the known dates of attack, like the 10th August 2012
But it's not known - it's speculation.
And when something does happen, as inevitably it will somewhere because 'something' always does happen 'somewhere', you will use that as vindication for your theories.
According to you it's not even necessary to be even remotely close to accurately predicting something as long as something happens somewhere.
For once words truly fail me.
Is there something in numerology?
I don't know - there does seem to be some sort of mathematical symmetry running through nature etc.
I'm no expert, far from it.
But what has been presented here as proof of it is just so wide of the mark.
Originally posted by drbatstein
You're already getting the excuses ready for the false flag on the 10th August...yeah, something was bound to happen somewhere on the 10th August, so the false flag that launched the war on Iran was just a coincidence
: