It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
It's also great to have some positive role models. I'm sick of our society putting these reality Tv celebs in our faces, trying to promote that vapid lifestyle as career choice for young people. Our women athletes have been absolutely amazing, they are articulate, dedicated and very attractive. I'm much happier seeing these people being seen as the real celebrities that our youth should be trying to emulate than "The Only way is Essex" variety.
Even football/soccer/tennis/e.t.c players provide regular entertainment, but olympic athletes train for six or more years at tax payer expense so they can compete for 10 mins.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by Raivan31
....?? The vast majority of olympians have actual jobs. This is just a hobby that they happen to be exceptionally good at. Most olympians don't even get paid, and have to fork out their own money to make sure they get to the games. "What service do they provide" .. what an ignorant question.
Originally posted by knowledgedesired
1. Tax payers do not pay for the years and years and years of training and hard work these athletes put in to compete and many of these come out of pocket for ALL expenses.
2. National pride of which we used to have allot but that has been slowed sucked away from us in the USA.
Originally posted by fusionhunter
So your saying it's no use to society having people who are talented at sport?
They represent the pride of your country and they're role models for the younger generations that aspire to maybe one day compete in the Olympics but it isn't just the Olympics they compete in. I thought that would be fairly obvious.edit on 3-8-2012 by fusionhunter because: (no reason given)
Well I've just told you.
Originally posted by Raivan31
Originally posted by fusionhunter
So your saying it's no use to society having people who are talented at sport?
They represent the pride of your country and they're role models for the younger generations that aspire to maybe one day compete in the Olympics but it isn't just the Olympics they compete in. I thought that would be fairly obvious.edit on 3-8-2012 by fusionhunter because: (no reason given)
No, that is not what i am saying, I'm ASKING what use it is, not stating that they have no use. there's a difference.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by CallYourBluff
Yes, but if they can presented with an alternative, then that should be a good thing. Hopefully this will inspire a young girl to be more of a Victoria Pendleton, than a Victoria Beckham.
Great Britain female cyclists, just broken world record. Nice going girls.edit on 3-8-2012 by woodwardjnr because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
reply to post by CallYourBluff
Yes, but if they can presented with an alternative, then that should be a good thing. Hopefully this will inspire a young girl to be more of a Victoria Pendleton, than a Victoria Beckham.
Great Britain female cyclists, just broken world record. Nice going girls.edit on 3-8-2012 by woodwardjnr because: (no reason given)