It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Manhater
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
What they should do, rather then firing him, is stick him on a probationary period that deals only in the customer service relations. Let him get a taste of his own medicine.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Excellent point. According to the liberal/socialist point of view, no single person does anything. The group does everything. How many major inventions were invented by committee?
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Liberals are collectivists. That means they cant tell the difference between the President of a company and a simple employee. They think if one is guilty, all must be guilty. As America becomes more communistoid you`ll be seeing much more of this.
Originally posted by Manhater
Doesn't matter, he was off the job and his performance has nothing to do with Chick Filet. If he wants to be an arse that's his pejorative but to lose his job over this, is nothing short of politics. Not saying he was in the right, because I myself have dealt with it on my end, but for someone to get him fired, it's just wrong.
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Liberals are collectivists. That means they cant tell the difference between the President of a company and a simple employee. They think if one is guilty, all must be guilty. As America becomes more communistoid you`ll be seeing much more of this.
This comment really does nothing to advance the conversation. How about finding a better way to phrase your comment?
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Liberals are collectivists. That means they cant tell the difference between the President of a company and a simple employee. They think if one is guilty, all must be guilty. As America becomes more communistoid you`ll be seeing much more of this.
Conservatives are idiots, this means that they cannot tell the difference between fact and fantasy.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
This comment really does nothing to advance the conversation. How about finding a better way to phrase your comment?
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Liberals are collectivists. That means they cant tell the difference between the President of a company and a simple employee. They think if one is guilty, all must be guilty. As America becomes more communistoid you`ll be seeing much more of this.
Conservatives are idiots, this means that they cannot tell the difference between fact and fantasy.
Originally posted by buster2010
Freedom of speech doesn't give you the right to harass someone. Which is just what this guy did.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
This comment really does nothing to advance the conversation. How about finding a better way to phrase your comment?
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Liberals are collectivists. That means they cant tell the difference between the President of a company and a simple employee. They think if one is guilty, all must be guilty. As America becomes more communistoid you`ll be seeing much more of this.
Conservatives are idiots, this means that they cannot tell the difference between fact and fantasy.
Originally posted by Chance321
reply to post by gimme_some_truth
That's just it. This is a blown up protest over nothing. No where did he say they won't hire gays, won't serve gays, ecrt. Just that he feels marrage should be bewteen a man and a woman. Well, lets string him up he voiced an (gasp) opinion that doesn't agree with theirs.
Actually, his comment does. He states his belief that liberals are collectivists(this is demonstrably true), and uses that hypothesis to explain why a liberal would think it acceptable to attack a lowly worker in a company perceived as "evil"(which to them means that said company/group disagrees with them) instead of taking their issue up with the individual who made the offensive comment.
Originally posted by nunyadammm
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
This comment really does nothing to advance the conversation. How about finding a better way to phrase your comment?
Originally posted by detachedindividual
Originally posted by lucid eyes
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
What could the girl in the drive through do anyway?
Liberals are collectivists. That means they cant tell the difference between the President of a company and a simple employee. They think if one is guilty, all must be guilty. As America becomes more communistoid you`ll be seeing much more of this.
Conservatives are idiots, this means that they cannot tell the difference between fact and fantasy.
Neither does the comment it replies to but you had no problem with that one at all, did ya?
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Eurisko2012
I just agreed with oriely, someone check hell quick, it must be freezing down there.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by Eurisko2012
I just agreed with oriely, someone check hell quick, it must be freezing down there.
The Factor with Bill O'Reilly is a great show. Millions of people watch it everyday.
Come join the party!
Bill pulls no punches.