It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
Even though we compete as 'Team GB' and are a 'British' team, i've still seen and heard numerous references to a medal winner being the first Welshman to win this, or the first Scot since 1962 to get a medal in that...etc.
I don't think there is anything in it. The MSM get criticised for generalising, then they try to add a little more specificity and they get this...
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Tykonos
For pity's sake, millions of Americans call themselves Irish Americans or Italian Americans - it's something that is exclusive to the USA.
All my grandparents were Irish, I was born in England and consider myself English first and British a close second, (yes I know, most Americans etc don't get that but that's not the topic under discussion) - if I were to call myself Irish English I would quite rightly be ridiculed by both English and Irish.
African American is a PC term that has come into everyday use in the US as far as I can see.
Not one of my Black friends is even slightly offended by the use of the term 'Black' - as I said before it's all about context.
And there was no racist context in this comment - it was a statement of fact.
Seems to me like some people just like to make an issue out of nothing so that they think they can be seen to be PC etc.
Other's seem to want to see 'something' in everything and want to be thought of as the people who 'get it' and we are all just blind and ignorant.
It's all complete and utter bollocks and detracts from the real and genuine issues which we should be addressing.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
reply to post by Tykonos
That's actually a very valid point.
My general point was that the initial identification of someone as being of a particular nationality is not always the same identification that they, or their fans, may prefer.
reply to post by NoSoup4U
I even think about race when she was performing.
Most whites
Originally posted by RedParrotHead
She was the first African American to win the gold in that particular event.
She was, and she is. I don't get the big deal. Maybe you (OP) never thought once about her race/heritage but that does not change the facts, besides which you knew it just by looking at her...what about a blind person who was following the games? Or a blind African-American/black child that might be inspired by an athlete that they can relate to, even if only by shared heritage?
It's OK to mention a persons heritage without it being part of some grand scheme to separate us. Stop feeding into the madness.
Originally posted by Sinny
Aren't they like, making her race a *good* thing?
Just like Obama is the "First black President"?!
Its people like your self who make a deal out of it.
Originally posted by acmpnsfal
Reply to post by florencenorthampton
The opening ceremonies had a lot of historical innacuracies because the times that were portrayed have a lot of dark issues surrounding them. Are you also going to complain that all the workers from the industrial revolution bit were adults? I mean there were clearly children working in those factories.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by AutOmatIc
Originally posted by Sinny
Aren't they like, making her race a *good* thing?
Just like Obama is the "First black President"?!
Its people like your self who make a deal out of it.
You missed the point. We shouldn't even be looking at her race at all. We should only be looking at the fact that she is an amazing athlete, the fact that she is African American shouldn't even be mentioned...ever.