It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And you're citing yourself. How convenient. Isn't there something in T&C against self-promotion?
Instead, the alignment of successive pyramids first steadily improved up to the building of the Great Pyramid, then later deteriorated. This makes perfect sense, she says, if the architects were measuring the alignment using not one star, but two: Mizar in Ursa Major (the Big Dipper) and Kochab in Ursa Minor (the Little Dipper). Rewinding the astronomical clock using modern computers shows that the two stars rotated around the pole opposite each other in the Old Kingdom sky. In other words, an imaginary line joining the stars passed through the north pole. When the two stars lay vertically above each other, both would mark the position of true north for the pyramid builders. However, due to precession, the line joining Mizar and Kochab only drifted into precise alignment with the north pole in 2467 BC, then wandered away (see graphic). The orientation of successive pyramids faithfully tracks this drift, Spence says, explaining the rise and fall of north-south alignment precision. If Spence is right, it is now possible to use astronomical records to date the pyramids to the nearest five years. For example, construction of the Great Pyramid at Giza began between 2485 and 2475 BC. "I'm as convinced as I think one can be in archaeology," Spence says.
Kate Spence is not insisting anything -- she's presenting empirical evidence that clearly explains the dates of the pyramids -- empirical evidence ignored by cult mind controlled "ancient alien" CIA-Freemasonic induced babblers in esoterica, etc.
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by Everywhen
Kate Spence is not insisting anything -- she's presenting empirical evidence that clearly explains the dates of the pyramids -- empirical evidence ignored by cult mind controlled "ancient alien" CIA-Freemasonic induced babblers in esoterica, etc.
So the New Scientist article on Kate Spence gives more details
Instead, the alignment of successive pyramids first steadily improved up to the building of the Great Pyramid, then later deteriorated. This makes perfect sense, she says, if the architects were measuring the alignment using not one star, but two: Mizar in Ursa Major (the Big Dipper) and Kochab in Ursa Minor (the Little Dipper). Rewinding the astronomical clock using modern computers shows that the two stars rotated around the pole opposite each other in the Old Kingdom sky. In other words, an imaginary line joining the stars passed through the north pole. When the two stars lay vertically above each other, both would mark the position of true north for the pyramid builders. However, due to precession, the line joining Mizar and Kochab only drifted into precise alignment with the north pole in 2467 BC, then wandered away (see graphic). The orientation of successive pyramids faithfully tracks this drift, Spence says, explaining the rise and fall of north-south alignment precision. If Spence is right, it is now possible to use astronomical records to date the pyramids to the nearest five years. For example, construction of the Great Pyramid at Giza began between 2485 and 2475 BC. "I'm as convinced as I think one can be in archaeology," Spence says.
The CIA was established by Harry Truman, a 33rd Degree Freemason, to implement global governance.
The CIA is not "controlled" by the State Department - but instead the CIA was created by Wall St. lawyers working with the Nazis through the OSS preparing for anti-labor struggles in Europe.
the alleged connections between UFOs and demonology. Tim notes of this particularly controversial theory in his post: "It’s UFOlogy’s dirty little secret. It’s something that is better left swept under the rug. Stanton Friedman doesn’t talk about it. Stephen Bassett most assuredly would keep the subject at arm’s length. The late Richard Hall would have deleted you from his address book. And Steven Greer would never consider it part of his ongoing Disclosure program. To coin ourselves a catch-all phrase that brings together all the negative aspects of the subject, I prefer to call it the DARK SIDE OF UFOLOGY!"
Originally posted by fulllotusqigong
reply to post by Everywhen
So Greer is just a symptom of this larger problem.
If people are not able to properly contexualize Greer's ufo cult then he won't be properly understood.
I also recommend Nick Redfern's book Contactees -- I'm just finishing it right now.
On slice of Sincerity.
One large slice of Delusions of Grandeur.
A smallish slice labeled Greedy.
And a slightly bigger one, still skinny, labeled Cultic.
There was room left over for one hefty slice that had to do with Greer's moral and ethical status, but I didn't know what to call it. Evil? No, that seemed way too strong. I settled on Naughty Then I topped the whole thing off with a generous dollop of Jerk.