It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpearMint
And if you don't allow citizens to have guns, those crazy people won't have access to them. Sure people may be better protected in very rare situations, but it's statistically obvious that guns increase homicide, those deaths outweigh the lives saved by a citizen owning a gun.
Originally posted by Mianeye
Lame
Some things are usefull in the daily life of running society, like knife's, car's or whatever...
Gun's are usefull for absolutly nothing..
Originally posted by isyeye
reply to post by SpearMint
Let's just ban people's hands then too. That's really where the problem is. If they didn't have hands they couldn't hold the gun, knife, or other weapon. I guess they could try the zombie approach and bite them to death though...perhaps we should ban teeth as well...
Any other murder weapon is a lot harder to kill people with, they're more likely to get caught or killed.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Any other murder weapon is a lot harder to kill people with, they're more likely to get caught or killed.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Why do people not understand this simple concept? Guns enable people to kill. You can dig a hole with your hands, but it's a lot easier with a shovel. The phrase "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is used over and over again, it's meaningless, OF COURSE people kill people, because they have a gun at their disposal. Any other murder weapon is a lot harder to kill people with, they're more likely to get caught or killed.
England and the USA's non-gun related homicide rate per 100k people is very similar, however gun homicide in the USA is 24.75 times higher, that's a HUGE amount. More people are murdered with guns than saved by guns.
Stop using the "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" argument, it's stupid. Make a real argument.edit on 2-8-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kastogere
reply to post by SpearMint
Do you know why you cannot return scissors in the USA to a store after you bought them? Because it is a weapon that is very hard to trace. The FBI knows that. Sure they can tell ya what size....but what brand...where it was sold?
Too common of a weapon that makes a bigger hole than a regular knife does.
Not to give you any ideas....but it is painfully clear that you would prefer living in a society with everything made of plastic rounded edges so no one ever gets hurt.
Whats it gonna take for you to humor the other side of the fence for a while. Granted a gun makes a nice weapon...and yes if you get shot you might die. But a knife will actually do far more damage than a bullet in the right hands. And I know people that can throw them with pin point accuracy from across the room quite a distance.
So what should we ban next? Sporks? Salad tongs? Pencils? Training wheels on motorcycles? Cars that can only go 30 mph for safety's sake?
Where should we draw the line?
Originally posted by SpearMint
Exactly this. They are only made for killing, which is reflected in the USA's homicide statistics.
Originally posted by Kastogere
Originally posted by SpearMint
Why do people not understand this simple concept? Guns enable people to kill. You can dig a hole with your hands, but it's a lot easier with a shovel. The phrase "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is used over and over again, it's meaningless, OF COURSE people kill people, because they have a gun at their disposal. Any other murder weapon is a lot harder to kill people with, they're more likely to get caught or killed.
England and the USA's non-gun related homicide rate per 100k people is very similar, however gun homicide in the USA is 24.75 times higher, that's a HUGE amount. More people are murdered with guns than saved by guns.
Stop using the "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" argument, it's stupid. Make a real argument.edit on 2-8-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Ok a real argument, lets say that it is not the tool that kills but the motivation to. Hows that? Any person has the ability to kill regardless of if there's a gun or not. The motivation has to be there first. And your argument that if people didn't have a gun available they would likely not kill because of fear of their own life or getting caught because it'd be too hard....is bogus. All a person needs is the right motivation to kill someone and hard to do or not, they'll make it happen.
When that decision is made they don't care at that point if they get caught. Most serial killers didn't use a gun, they used their hands. And more often than not their prey was much bigger than themselves.