It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
San Bernardino, Calif., filed for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday citing more than $1 billion of debts and making it the third California city to seek protection from creditors. San Bernardino declared a fiscal crisis last month after a report said local government had tapped out its reserves and projected spending would top revenue by $45 million in the fiscal year that began on July 1. In the past two months, the cities of Stockton and Mammoth Lakes have also filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy
It is time to pay the piper people. Cut spending at all levels of government. It is the only way to begin getting back on track.
A recent report by the city attorney said officials had falsified budget reports to the mayor and council for 13 of the last 16 years, hiding the scale of the city's debt.
This is an interesting post. What do think is a fair percentage of peoples income that should be taxed? The last thing I want to do is put words in your mouth/writing. If anything I'm interested in clarification of your point.Understand it is somewhat of a loaded question, I make no bones about it. Maybe I'm not understanding what you're inferring.
Originally posted by buster2010
That's just it people don't want to pay the piper. Cities and states need tax revenue to run on and as long as you have people crying we don't want to pay taxes then keep looking for more cities to fail.
I agree, people need to go to jail, but even without the lying about the budgets they are still bloated and need to be cut. Spending is the problem.
Originally posted by buster2010
reply to post by DarthMuerte
It is time to pay the piper people. Cut spending at all levels of government. It is the only way to begin getting back on track.
That's just it people don't want to pay the piper. Cities and states need tax revenue to run on and as long as you have people crying we don't want to pay taxes then keep looking for more cities to fail.
Also this may not have happened if people weren't falsifying document showing how bad things have been for the past 16 years Somebody needs to go to jail.
A recent report by the city attorney said officials had falsified budget reports to the mayor and council for 13 of the last 16 years, hiding the scale of the city's debt.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
"The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money". Margaret Thatcher
Everybody is paying attention to the problems in Europe, but more and more American cities are bankrupt. Many still struggle complaining about declining revenues when the real problem is overspending. Inflated budgets, and even lying about those budgets can only lead to financial troubles. It is time to pay the piper people. Cut spending at all levels of government. It is the only way to begin getting back on track.
bottomline.nb cnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by buster2010
reply to post by DarthMuerte
That's just it people don't want to pay the piper. Cities and states need tax revenue to run on and as long as you have people crying we don't want to pay taxes then keep looking for more cities to fail.
You do understand that just about everyone who works on the books pays well over 20 percent, hence my loaded question.I think people get so caught up in the income tax that they lose sight of all the other taxes we are subjected to. It makes not only the national, but local debts even more confusing to me. Think about this. Now I'm going off memory, but if I remember correctly the average yearly income tax is somewhere around 17.4 percent of generated income. Now let's include sales taxes, excise taxes, fuel taxes, vehicle registration taxes, utility taxes, phone taxes, garbage disposal taxes, ect, ect. I'm just touching on a few. How many really pay attention to how many things get taxed? What is the true percentage of peoples income that gets taxed? 30 percent? 35 percent? 40 percent? I'm not anti tax. I understand that taxes are a necessary evil to sustain government, thus you need government to maintain order, peace, and infrastructure. At what point does it become unfair? Like I've stated before, let's say it's 30 percent. Take an annual salary of $30,000 and subtract 30 percent. That individual is virtually living at a poverty level.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
reply to post by GD21D
I know you didnt direct the Q at me, but id like to suggest 20% is a good number.
no matter what you earn you always pay 20%.
but you have to earn a minimum first before tax kicks in, so students and youth who earn from weekend work dont pay if you get my gist.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by GD21D
Income should not be taxed at all. Punishing a behavior results in altered behavior patterns. If you punish work/productivity by taxing it, you get less people wanting to work and/or be productive. Consumption should be taxed instead. We need to adopt "The Fair Tax"(fairtax.org) and do away with all other taxes.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
San Bernardino, Calif., files for bankruptcy with over $1 billion in debts
bottomline.nb cnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
San Bernardino, Calif., filed for bankruptcy protection on Wednesday citing more than $1 billion of debts and making it the third California city to seek protection from creditors. San Bernardino declared a fiscal crisis last month after a report said local government had tapped out its reserves and projected spending would top revenue by $45 million in the fiscal year that began on July 1. In the past two months, the cities of Stockton and Mammoth Lakes have also filed for Chapter 9 bankruptcy
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by GD21D
Income should not be taxed at all. Punishing a behavior results in altered behavior patterns. If you punish work/productivity by taxing it, you get less people wanting to work and/or be productive. Consumption should be taxed instead. We need to adopt "The Fair Tax"(fairtax.org) and do away with all other taxes.
I disagree with taxing income or production/work in any form. Punishing productivity is counter productive. Consumption is the issue, especially excessive consumption. That is what needs to be taxed/punished. We should consume only what we truly need. Taxing consumption would automatically reduce it.
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by GD21D
Income should not be taxed at all. Punishing a behavior results in altered behavior patterns. If you punish work/productivity by taxing it, you get less people wanting to work and/or be productive. Consumption should be taxed instead. We need to adopt "The Fair Tax"(fairtax.org) and do away with all other taxes.
We need a fair flat tax percentage for everyone. Also introducing a luxury tax wouldn't hurt either.