It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A study I conducted in the summer of 1993 in Washington, DC, shows rising crime levels over a period of six months, which take place every year as the temperature gets hotter between the winter and the summer. People stay out later, they are more aggravated and agitated, they get into more fights, and the crime rate goes up. This is an absolutely known annual trend. From June through July of that summer, we brought to the area a large number of practicing meditators and trained quite a few others. When the group reached a particular size—2,500 (ultimately reaching 4,000)—which was about halfway through the period, there was a distinct and highly statistically significant drop in crime compared to expected rates based on previous data, weather conditions, and a variety of other factors.
We collaborated with the local police department, the FBI, and 24 leading, independent criminologists and social scientists from major institutions, including the University of Maryland, the University of Texas, and Temple University, who used highly sophisticated research tools to control for variables such as weather. Everyone ended up agreeing on the language, the analysis, and the results, and those results were quite astonishing. We predicted a 20 percent drop in crime, and we achieved a 25 percent drop. Just before the study, the Washington, DC, chief of police went on television and said something like, “It’s gonna take a foot of snow in June to reduce crime by 20 percent.” But he allowed his department to participate in the experiment by collecting and analyzing the data. In the end, the police department signed on as one of the authors of a published paper (see Social Indicators Research 47:153–201, June 1999).
Most people who are starving have no access to the book or the video.
If people are to helpless to help themselves, then the it won't work.
Originally posted by Sulie
No, I am not heartless. I am a realist. As I said, nowhere in the book does it claim to be magic into the lives of people who are wishing. Life takes action, and if anything "The Secret," points that out. If people are to
This post was part of a special Halloween Homage to Orson Wells.helpless to help themselves, then the it won't work.
Jumping out from behind the server and shouting BOO!
Last spring I had a job that stressed me out and made me unhappy. So I started applying for other positions at other companies. For several months I had no luck and was quickly becoming discouraged and feeling trapped at my job.
Finally, after prodding from my Mom and my girlfriend (both of whom had been fans of The Secret for months), I picked up the book and read. What I found there truly changed my life. I became a more positive, peaceful individual. I was full of hope and began using The Secret to visualize my new job.
I re-applied for a company that I really wanted to work for, and within a couple weeks I had my first interview. I kept visualizing and believing, and two weeks after that I had my second interview.
Originally posted by iforget
I think there may well be something to the idea of positive thought there is a famous example explained well here
A study I conducted in the summer of 1993 in Washington, DC, shows rising crime levels over a period of six months, which take place every year as the temperature gets hotter between the winter and the summer. People stay out later, they are more aggravated and agitated, they get into more fights, and the crime rate goes up. This is an absolutely known annual trend. From June through July of that summer, we brought to the area a large number of practicing meditators and trained quite a few others. When the group reached a particular size—2,500 (ultimately reaching 4,000)—which was about halfway through the period, there was a distinct and highly statistically significant drop in crime compared to expected rates based on previous data, weather conditions, and a variety of other factors.
We collaborated with the local police department, the FBI, and 24 leading, independent criminologists and social scientists from major institutions, including the University of Maryland, the University of Texas, and Temple University, who used highly sophisticated research tools to control for variables such as weather. Everyone ended up agreeing on the language, the analysis, and the results, and those results were quite astonishing. We predicted a 20 percent drop in crime, and we achieved a 25 percent drop. Just before the study, the Washington, DC, chief of police went on television and said something like, “It’s gonna take a foot of snow in June to reduce crime by 20 percent.” But he allowed his department to participate in the experiment by collecting and analyzing the data. In the end, the police department signed on as one of the authors of a published paper (see Social Indicators Research 47:153–201, June 1999).
source
Physicist and skeptic Robert L. Park called the study a "clinic in data distortion".[96][97] Park questioned the validity of the study by saying that during the weeks of the experiment Washington, D.C.'s weekly murder count hit the highest level ever recorded.[96]
Maxwell Rainforth, Assistant Professor of Physiology and Health and Statistics at Maharishi University of Management and a coauthor of the Washington, D.C. study, acknowledged that the 36-hour period was "horrific," but said that, from a scientific perspective, it was a statistical outlier because homicides by themselves constituted a small data set. He said that homicides comprised 3% of violent crimes in the year of the study (1993). Rainforth characterized Park's criticisms of the study as "superficial, highly polemical" and "willfully misleading", and that his objections to the use of time series analysis and other statistical methods were not based on scientific arguments. He also questioned whether Park had read the published study, since his criticism focused on a preliminary Interim Report released at a press conference in 1994.[98]
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, "those outside the movement" did not see the cause and effect that the study asserted.[56] The Maharishi called the study, which cost $6 million, a "waste of time" and said that scientific research is a fraud.[99] As a result of this study, John Hagelin received the 1994 Ig Nobel Prize in peace, a parody of the Nobel Prize, described at the time as an award for discoveries "that cannot, or should not, be reproduced."[100][101] More recently, the Ig Nobel's tagline has been updated, and "honors achievements that first make people laugh, and then make them think".[102][103] and The editor of the Annals of Improbable Research said that no scientific analysis of John Hagelin’s work was conducted before the Ig Nobel Prize was awarded.
Maybe we should be sending copies of 'the secret' out to 3rd world countries instead of untied nations aid packages , medicine and food. For someone who claims to be not heartless and a realist you sure do have a funny take on the world
Originally posted by willrush
reply to post by reppie
well even if it isnt true what the movie has to say.. isnt it an interesting thought??
i like to think about how these kinds of ideas could really work in our world..
do you not find it fun to think about things like this?.. to imagine if it were literally possible to make your own reality!...
true or not.. i like to think that it could be true haha
Originally posted by magma
reply to post by LesMisanthrope
So on one hand you have a group of people who agree on the results, on the other hand you have group who disagree.
Isn't that what science is about?
Originally posted by willrush
reply to post by 1littlewolf
thanks for that link!.. i read the OP of it and it was awesome! haha
it was very informal and made me see how i might be able to use LOA in my life.
we'll see how it works out..
i wonder though.. when using the LOA, can it be done within one day so that you can actually tell whether it works or not?
or is it something that takes place over time?
im not saying i will become skeptical if it doesnt work after a few days but i am just curious
Originally posted by PhoenixOD
The secret is such BS.
Imagine telling someone who is starving to death that the only reason they are not better off is that they just didn't wish for it hard enough or they just didnt want it hard enough.
Try telling someone with a terminal disease that they are going to die because they just haven't wished to live in the right way.
Originally posted by willrush
reply to post by magma
exactly magma!.. we create our own reality...
so you have seen this movie??..
do you know how to use this secret in your life?.. just wondering..
haha