It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DeltaChaos
There already is a rover on the moon. We left it there in '73.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by Murcielago
HowardRoark
I have no intention of being the grammar nazi here, but if you can�t even bother to capitalize the word �I,� then well, . . .
WHAT! your bitchin because someone didn't capitalize an eye? who gives a #.
The failure to follow some simple and easy rules of grammar, punctuation and capitalization only reflects back on the person making the post. An occasional typo is one thing, we all have those, but this is something different. It is called intellectual laziness.
This isn�t a high school.
and this isnt college, or being submitted to a political office, and even well known authors have grammer nazi's that proof read their work, the point is to here is to express your opinions openly here about conspiracies without having to dot every "I" or worry about grammer, or if it is beneath u to tolerate poor grammer u should seek people to communicate with that are as perfect as u think u are
Originally posted by Off_The_Street
Genesiss, if you really want to believe that we didn't go to the moon, then, of course, it is your choice to do so.
All your comments, including the Van Allen Belt radiation, the fact that the exposure on the still cameras were set to capture the people and moonscape and not the stars, the so-called "rippling" flag, the inability to discern among thermal radiation, conduction, and convection, and whatever else have been debunked over and over and over again.
Your questions and comments tell me that you are either a johnny-come-lately to the discussion, or are refusing to believe evidence because you choose to believe the hoax scenario.
But again, this is a (more or less) free country; you may believe whatever you choose.
Originally posted by COOL HAND
Originally posted by genesiss
howard once again u are feeding in to my point to easily, give me some real evidence we did go to the moon. I have not decided either way but i dont believe that we know the truth, and one more thing howard, VAN ALLEN BELT, say it with me buddy, VAN ALLEN BELT, let me know when u can explain it away
How bout this for evidence.
During Apollo 11's mission several pieces of scientific gear were emplaced on the surface for taking measurements. Everyone else here points to the laser reflector, which is used for taking precise distance measurements to the moon. Among the other experiements that they set up (as did subsequent missions) was a seismic detector. These detectors were able to allow scientists to determine the weight of the moon by crashing the expended S-IVB onto the surface and recording the impact.
Apollo PSE's
"The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense." -- Dr. James Van Allen
Originally posted by genesiss
...please explain your theory on the 40 year lapse in going back for us or anyone else,,why will we not return
Originally posted by Zipdot
Originally posted by genesiss
Originally posted by Zipdot
Oh, snap!
Moon landing hoax supporters totally refuse and ignore the evidence that supports the FACT that we landed on the moon. Why? Why do they want to so badly believe that we didn't land on the moon? Is it so horrible that we said we would land on the moon and then we did?
Hoax supporters think things are SO SIMPLE when in reality there is a thick layer of science beneath everything about space travel from beginning to end. Hoax supporters think themselves to be juniour scientists just because they can say the phrase "Van Allen Belt."
Hoax supporters: read the Bad Astronomy page and LET IT GO.
Zip
yea those stupid junior reports on fox, how did they get on tv anyway? right? lolmao give me a break theres scientific evidence both ways, please quote facts when saying we went there, not just "we did" theres lots of evidence to prove we did not
Yeah, FOX, the people who brought you Alien Autopsy. Ever hear of ratings? You know how advertising works, right?
As for calling badastronomy.com disinformation -- all I can say to that is "hoo boy..."
Your mind is obviously not going to be changed with even the most reasonable and logical arguements and the most solid evidence.
Anyway, why do you think we didn't go to the moon -- why do you think we were lied to?
Zip
Originally posted by genesiss
thats great and i agree that doesnt make alot of sense, then again u have the word of nasa they actually have that ability, then please explain your theory on the 40 year lapse in going back for us or anyone else,,why will we not return
Originally posted by jra
Originally posted by genesiss
...please explain your theory on the 40 year lapse in going back for us or anyone else,,why will we not return
Let me ask you something. What can NASA use to get back to the Moon with? They have nothing. The shuttle can't get any higher than a low orbit, so that's out of the question. They arn't building Apollo style rockets/capsules anymore, so that's out of the question. NASA doesn't get the money that they used to back in the day either, and that's the main problem. That and the over amount of bureaucracy that has bloated the administration.
Originally posted by genesiss
so hopefully the moderator closes this topic since its pointless to discuss this
Originally posted by Zipdot
Gen made the arguement, "it's on TV, it MUST be real!"
I think that says it all for this guy...
He doesn't read web pages that people post to debunk him, thus he limits his knowledge of the subject to purposely stay ignorant.
Then he says he won't be revisiting this topic... I guess he's giving up.
Zip
Originally posted by genesiss
fox is a legitimate news station that presented a theory to the public,,
Originally posted by genesiss
...snip...
your cute little statement about ignorance (and if u are trying to say im ignorant for not understanding the phd level of science they try to use to explain how we did go and now cannot or will not makes me ignorant then u may be right and alot of those web sites most people couldnt really understand unless they had a phd, remember reading and understanding are two very different thingsand i doubt that u actually have the education to understand the science) and that makes me an idiot only means that u are calling most of the public idiots for believing in the moon walk in the first place based on the tv footage, thats very hypocritical my friend
p.s. i do read the web sites by the way and while i may not be educated in that field of science which DOES make me and anyone else like me who is not educated in that field ignorant i did manage to notice they never answer the questions about the abnormalities that make us doubt we went, they just preset the proof we did and avoid the abnormalities questions, so thats not debunking in my opinion thats debating and ask yourself since u believe so much without personal knowledge of science to really understand how we did or did not go, what if we didnt go? would that shake your faith in our government? in their ability to lead when they lied so much? thats a great reason for people to get so hostile about the subject and why if we didnt go u can bet thats why they will never tell us
later guys ill see u all in a post thats a little less hostile and debating
Originally posted by mr_sheldon
The moon is barren, you won't be hurting the environment or the atmosphere cause there's barely one.
jra
Let me ask you something. What can NASA use to get back to the Moon with? They have nothing. The shuttle can't get any higher than a low orbit, so that's out of the question. They arn't building Apollo style rockets/capsules anymore, so that's out of the question. NASA doesn't get the money that they used to back in the day either, and that's the main problem. That and the over amount of bureaucracy that has bloated the administration.