Can Obama Seduce Young Voters While Robbing Them Blind? Again?

Based on what I've seen personally, the answer is a big, fat, YES. I've talked to a lot of people around campus over the past year, and it seems that none of them know anything about Obama's policies and will vote for him because he's black. Again. I'm hoping that it's just because I'm in California, but let's just say I haven't been too optimistic after visiting other states and getting similar responses.

God, I hate my generation sometimes...

An elected official is like a lawyer, you're basically saying, ''I'm too busy/stupid/lazy to oversee the matters at hand so I'm gonna pick this guy to do the work for me.'' Is it really any surprise there's a huge grey area? That being said, yes, seduction is will occur and voters will vote, whether Obama's campaign will have the gusto or support of the powers/media is to be seen.

Subjugating important social matters to a political rep. could be effective if we were voting members in an out of office as per how well they adhered to their word daily or weekly. In reality its a popularity contest, and when one falls another takes the spot and the cycle continues, so long as we continue to ''vote'' and keep the process going we'll keep speculating and ''they'll'' keep pulling strings behind the scenes.

My good friend always promoted something he called the ''blatancy policy'': He firmly believed that in a quick dashing display of whatever he was trying to hide placed directly in the person's face, he could get away with almost anything, despite the fact that person was cognitive of this thing. He explained that it was a combination of sensory overload and them not expecting it, causing confusion and acceptance, thus, obscuring his action and hypnotizing the person.

Tell a sheeple about the tax payer dollars being stolen and they'll nod and give a disconcerting, ''I know, terrible'' but they won't take it to heart, its just too obvious and out of sight, out of mind, despite being right in there face.
Sadly, Obama's ''Change'' campaign was precisely what our society needs; real change, a totally social and political upheaval style of change. Good luck to anybody in the future trying to spur ''change,'' it is now a dead horse.

Sorry if I'm slightly derailing this thread I felt inspired to write this and I think the blatancy policy is worth reading, anyhow carry on troops !

reply to post by RealSpoke

Mitt Romney is a Zionist Mormon who is promising to go to war with Iran. That ALONE should be the number one reason to not vote for him. Why would any American support someone who is threatening the stability of this country with WAR? A war with Iran would destroy this country.

Umm yea and Obama has been so peaceful How about that military action in Libya?? Or those drone strikes in countries we have not declared war on? At least Romney is being forward about it. As if using drones in non-war zones isn't an act of war. And people have the gall to call us conservatives warmongers.....

reply to post by antonia


I asked my daughter if she and her friend would vote for Obama again...Her answer was a big NO! She asked many of her friends and they all same. Oh, I voted for the other guy last election.

Originally posted by nighthawk1954
reply to post by antonia

 

I asked my daughter if she and her friend would vote for Obama again...Her answer was a big NO! She asked many of her friends and they all same. Oh, I voted for the other guy last election.

The apple generally doesn't fall far from the tree. I'm not insulting your choice or anything, but birds of a feather tend to flock together you know. It wouldn't be surprising your daughter would share your particular political persuasion nor is it surprising her friends would. I tend to look for polling data rather than look to my social circle as I don't consider that to be objective data.

reply to post by FlyersFan


Obama has nothing to do with foodstamps. Welfare benefits that are federally funded are controlled by the states. Plus you have to be in poverty to even get them.

Last time I checked the auto bail out was voted on by our congress people...not Obama.

What is free in Obamacare? You have to pay for private insurance. Obamacare is a conservative think tank plan..sooo..nearly identical to Romneycare.

reply to post by jibeho


Obama isn't a Zionist, Romney is. His philosophical outlook in the world is to protect Israel to the end. Romney himself said he would start a ground war with troops against Iran without congressional approval. That right there is enough to say GARBAGE HUMAN BEING.

Anyway, I don't like either of them..they are both banker spokesman. It is sad that you're defending one over the other when they are nearly identical.

DO NOT VOTE FOR EITHER

reply to post by hangedman13

At least Romney is being forward about it.

LOL. Are you kidding me?

You know, it's no big deal cause Romney's up front about it. Ground war, massive deaths, depleted uranium all over the place, quadriplegics, quadruple amputees. No BIG DEAL...cause he admits it and all.

Stop defending Romney because you hate Obama.

You have looked at WHY there was an increase in our debt, right? Could it POSSIBLY be those TWO WARS started by the Republican party that was handed off to Obama?

With that same party beating the War Drums for Iran, and also for Russia (McCain was talking about it in the elections in 08, for those that ACTUALLY watch those and see where each candidate stands on each issue), if we elect Romney we will be in far worse shape.

Obama has made it his goal to end the wars, and focus on improving things at home. It's a slow process, but I haven't seen anything that contradicts that goal.

I'll watch the debates this year again before I vote, instead of mindlessly voting like most of you...I have a feeling it will again be for Obama. Which is the better choice of the 2 at this point in time. I agree, neither is a saint, but change is a slow thing....especially how people are reacting these days. If a Black President came in and COMPLETELY changed EVERYTHING all at once with no slow transition, there would be riots (by the ignorant). It's a slow process of changing from a redneck war nation, to a nation that puts it's citizens first...and CARES what the rest of the world thinks about it. Using Diplomacy over a strike first and look for WMD's later mentality, and a "Rich can pay more" nation in order to give better public services to the hard working tax payers of this great nation.

Yes...Obama 2012.

Originally posted by Chance321
reply to post by jibeho

 

You know exactly how obama The Destroyer'll get the younger voters. He's gonna wait till it gets a little closer to election time and bailout the student loans. Then all these kids that got their college loans paid off by obama'll vote for him, "Cause he's such a great guy.

" .

If Obama wants to forgive my student loan debt...OK! I don't care if he does or doesn't, but I might as well get something out of the vote!

Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by jibeho

 

Whatever, you pat yourself on the back. Old people always blame us for everything.

I don't blame you for everything: just crappy lifeless swearing "music"

And "CELLPHONES"!

OH YEAH; AND JUSTIN BIEBER ("BEEBER"?)

And"snookie"...

reply to post by JRockABM


Here's a clue: "he's an expert communicator/radical organizer : he's lying to you by merely implying what you want to hear(like most pols). You filled in the blanks yourself:
100 Oh-supporters hear a speech

"Well what did you think #1?
" he speaks to my issues"
which are?
" lgbt rights and the environment".

"Well what did you think#2?
" he speaks to my generation"
which means?
" "fair share"& youth unemployment".

"Well what did you think#27?

" He speaks to my people"
which means?
" Obama's gonna pay for my gas and my mortgage!".
Need I ramble on?

Originally posted by 46ACE


I don't blame you for everything: just crappy lifeless swearing music

Invented before I was 12

And "CELLPHONES"!

Again, before I was 12.

OH YEAH; AND JUSTIN BIEBER ("BEEBER"?)
And"snookie"

I'm older than that by at least a decade.

Originally posted by antonia

Originally posted by 46ACE


I don't blame you for everything: just crappy lifeless swearing music

Invented before I was 12

And "CELLPHONES"!

Again, before I was 12.

OH YEAH; AND JUSTIN BIEBER ("BEEBER"?)
And"snookie"

I'm older than that by at least a decade.

Don't take it personally(just havin some fun): you didn't do anything anyway(Prez said so)

"Youth"....

Listen UP.

Here is something worth consideration

from July 9, 2012 article -- the Gateway Pundit

For the third year in a row college graduates are facing a dismal jobs market thanks to the failed policies of Barack Obama and fellow Democrats.
Yahoo-WSJ reported:

The Class of 2012 may have few reasons to celebrate this year. Along with the long-term unemployed, experts say their prospects are the bleakest among all job-seekers.

The U.S. economy added a lower-than-expected 80,000 jobs last month, according to data Friday from the Labor Department. Though the overall unemployment rate remained unchanged at 8.2%, experts say this year’s 1.8 million college graduates have a rough job search ahead. “Over the last five years, the jobs situation has gotten increasingly intense for each successive graduating class,” says Paul T. Conway, president of Generation Opportunity, a non-profit think-tank based in Arlington, Va. “Their concern is now palpable.”

The last half-decade has not been good to graduates. Only a half of those who graduated since 2006 are now employed full time, according to a recent Rutgers University survey. More college graduates are settling for jobs that in years past would have gone to those without degrees, while people in their 30s are now occupying jobs once taken by recent graduates, says Carl Van Horn, professor of public policy and director of Rutgers’ John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development .......

Generation Barack: Youth Unemployment Rate Soars to 16.8%

Careful WHO ya listen to !!

What has Obama done for TO YOU ?

reply to post by xuenchen


And Mitt Romney is NOT going to improve the economy. He is a crony capitalist who shipped jobs overseas. HELLO.

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by xuenchen

 

And Mitt Romney is NOT going to improve the economy. He is a crony capitalist who shipped jobs overseas. HELLO.

I could agree to a point.

But Obama & Co. are the ones who could have changed things.

He gets the blame or the fame as they say.

Romney has never been in a Federal position.

Soooo, nobody really knows what he will do as President.

It's all a wild guess isn't it.

You people are all deluded. You put all your faith into one man without realising that it is a huge machine with a mind of its own.
It doesn't matter who you vote for, the machine is going to troll along and debts will continue to rise and rise no matter who is voted into office.

Of course he will seduce them, because they are uneducated, easily misled robots. All it takes is some red diaper doper baby professor to tell them how to vote, and it's done. Democrats depend on idiots who can't think for themselves. Course, Republicans depend on tunnel vision morons who actually believe that they are voting for a conservative, when the truth is, they are just voting for one of two International Socialist, yes men, sell out puppets on a string.

It's nothihng short of a circus side-show.Keep the sheople herded and arguing with themselves over domestic issues while both parties rape the nation and continue the same foreign policy that their masters of puppet banksters ordered them to excecute. ~$heopleNation