It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by flashtrum
Originally posted by Erongaricuaro
Originally posted by flashtrum
...if you pick number 3, you are likely to win ZERO - WHICH WOULD YOU PICK?
If I pick #1 I will get 4 more years of bad luck.
If I pick #2 I will probably get 8 years of bad luck. Romneycare/Obamacare, what is the difference?
If I pick who I want I likely won't get it but at least I'm not preventing you from getting who you want, and whatever the consequences of it won't be my fault.
The choices all suck, but the last one seems least objectionable to me.
edit on 30-7-2012 by Erongaricuaro because: (no reason given)
The difference is that Romney feels (as more true conservatives do) that these types of choices should be left to the states and having the Feds involved in anything isn't really good for anybody.
My Dad used to say that the Post Office was the only self-sufficient government agency. Now look where we are. It's a mess because of government-centric ideals.
And the consequences WILL be your fault. The time to "make a statement" is long gone. But go ahead, write in Paul. It will make ZERO difference, except if the stock market loses enough points the day after and the company you work for decides that the layoffs there were considering are actually worth following through on, your job is gone, and in order for you to get to this site you'll need to take the bus down to the public library.
Again, I love the idealism and was a Paul supporter. But it is what it is people. Argue that there's little difference between Romney and Obama all you want. I'll trying to get you to look at this thing as it is. #1, there are two candidates left. There will be no crazy delegate fight. #2, go with every conspiracy in the book and Romney is still better for your checking account. He just is. If you put gay marriage ahead of making sure your kid goes to college, by all means vote for Barry. As a US Citizen it's your right. If you want any shade of what this country used to be and could be again, however faint - sorry but Mitt is our only choice here.
Originally posted by babybunnies
Just because the delegates elected were Ron Paul supporters surely doesn't translate into a win for this state for Ron Paul?
I'm an avid RP supporter, but this statement makes no sense.
Originally posted by flashtrum
The difference is that Romney feels (as more true conservatives do) that these types of choices should be left to the states and having the Feds involved in anything isn't really good for anybody.
My Dad used to say that the Post Office was the only self-sufficient government agency. Now look where we are. It's a mess because of government-centric ideals.
And the consequences WILL be your fault. The time to "make a statement" is long gone. But go ahead, write in Paul. It will make ZERO difference, except if the stock market loses enough points the day after and the company you work for decides that the layoffs there were considering are actually worth following through on, your job is gone, and in order for you to get to this site you'll need to take the bus down to the public library.
Again, I love the idealism and was a Paul supporter. But it is what it is people. Argue that there's little difference between Romney and Obama all you want. I'll trying to get you to look at this thing as it is. #1, there are two candidates left. There will be no crazy delegate fight. #2, go with every conspiracy in the book and Romney is still better for your checking account. He just is. If you put gay marriage ahead of making sure your kid goes to college, by all means vote for Barry. As a US Citizen it's your right. If you want any shade of what this country used to be and could be again, however faint - sorry but Mitt is our only choice here.
Originally posted by tpsreporter
Originally posted by flashtrum
"Yes We Can" maybe, but what they really mean is "No We Won't"
RP 2012 .... Gary Johnson 2016!!!!
And now, all RP supporters involved, need to move for that last line in 2012.
Stop beating your chests. Stop throwing away your vote.
If you want to change things, change them. If RP is out, and you want neither Obama or Romney (I know I don't), then move your vote to the next viable candidate for you. But don't throw it away.
Originally posted by johnnysixguns
reply to post by Common Good
Yes, I would like to dictate to you that since you also feel the need to vote along party lines (a pity vote for Romney cause you can't have RP?) that you are part of a division in this nation.
I am an Independent. I am also a Libertarian. And my primary vote was to RP because I saw the majority of my values in him. To say that because I can't vote for him, I will throw away my vote, is idiocy.
Maybe you're just too myopic to realize that.
Originally posted by johnnysixguns
reply to post by Common Good
No, the irony is that I am still practicing democracy. My candidate may not be elected, but my vote is legitimate, and I will see its percentage polled. You can't say the same for yourself.
Not to mention all this bull about a write-in vote is idiocy, purely for the fact that if RP supporters came together on another candidate, it DOES have the possibility to sway some REAL numbers.
It comes down to the fact you throw away your vote into thin air, while I throw my vote to something still relevant. And anyone else can do the same.
Originally posted by johnnysixguns
reply to post by Common Good
Gary Johnson, who is closely aligned with RP except for a few issues.
Thanks, I told you how to vote without entirely pissing into the wind.