posted on May, 23 2015 @ 04:29 AM
I'll give you another example no one has really mentioned yet. Anyone who has taken 6th grade should be familiar with people modifying the charts (or
that's when I had those classes atleast). One that you'll almost never be taught about though is polling results. When polls are conducted they will
find a certain number such as saying 54% of Americans are voting for Mitt Romney and 46% are voting for Obama. However, somewhere in the reporting of
the poll will be some fine print that states the margin of error on the poll. The margin could be as wide as 7%, so if someone wants to spin the poll
for Obama they'll add 7% to him while taking 7% from Romney, then they can report the poll as Romney 47%, Obama 53%. This is within the polls
reported data so it's completely legal to do. Alternatively, someone who wants to make the lead look like a landslide can say Romney 61%, Obama
39%.
Using this example you can often find the same poll with different numbers on every news network (Fox, CNN, MSNBC make for a good baseline
comparisons).
Edit: I'm going to give you one more and tell you exactly where to find it. Look up the 2008 bailouts, and the CEO's assigning bonuses.
It was reported like this
Bailout: 175 Billion
Bonuses: 165 Million
What they were doing is comparing 175 to 165 to make it look like most of the bailout money went to reward CEO's. Yet there was billion/million
stated but those numbers sound the same and aren't really comprehensible to people anyways, very few people can equate the difference in an order of
magnitude in their head. More accurate reporting would have said:
Bailout: 175,000 Million
Bonuses: 165 Million
This way the scale wouldn't have been changed when presenting the information.
edit on 23-5-2015 by Aazadan because: (no reason given)