It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Char-Lee
From Pye:
Nonetheless, based on the preliminary results now in hand, our research team is very confident that when the Starchild’s entire genome is recovered and sequenced, the total number of confirmed differences will be so staggering that it can only lead to a conclusion that the Starchild represents an entirely new humanoid species, and that species is “alien.”
www.starchildproject.com...
edit on 7/27/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SLAYER69
But she's part of the elite!
Either that or an alien hybrid.
Originally posted by SLAYER69The question in my mind has always been, Why? How did this tradition start?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by SLAYER69
It seems to me that there have been so many of these skulls found over the years and of course Nefertiti, that I am sure the test were done, long ago they simply are not going to tell the public about it.
Just trying to connect some dots here is all..
Half of European men share King Tut's DNA
Scientists at Zurich-based DNA genealogy centre, iGENEA, reconstructed the DNA profile of the boy Pharaoh, who ascended the throne at the age of nine, his father Akhenaten and grandfather Amenhotep III, based on a film that was made for the Discovery Channel. The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.
But Carsten Pusch, a geneticist at Germany's University of Tubingen who was part of the team that unraveled Tut's DNA from samples taken from his mummy and mummies of his family members, said that iGENEA's claims are "simply impossible." Pusch and his colleagues published part of their results, though not the Y-chromosome DNA, in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2010. The Y chromosome is the sex chromosome found only in males, and looking at the genes in this chromosome would show Tut's male lineage.
Pusch's team used snippets of Y-chromosome DNA to link Tut to his closest relatives, identifying his mom and dad. But they didn't publish the full genetic data that would allow genomics companies like iGENEA to link modern people to the Tutankhamen lineage. According to Scholz, that crucial data is what appeared on the Discovery Channel.
In exclusive email correspondence with Brien Foerster from "Ancient Aliens" on July 18, 2012, Unexplained Phenomena Examiner was able to obtain information about these skulls and an upcoming tour that is planned to visit the cities of Nazca, Ica and Paracas in Peru, where the elongated skulls were found. Although the tour is nearly sold out, limited space is still available.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SLAYER69
Dude.
The Phagester is cool.
Originally posted by sonnny1
reply to post by speculativeoptimist
I am also inclined to think, Birth defect.
Then again, I couldn't imagine what this child had to go through, while alive.........
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by PurpleChiten
sorry about your brother.
But the skulls in question have significant growth along the suture lines and extensive plate growth (as seen by the pics),
So I do see a difference.
(maybe I'm wrong? Support?)