It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DNA testing underway on 'alien hybrid human baby' found in Peru

page: 13
163
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 04:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by PurpleChiten
 


Don't those skulls look sorta like PurpleChiten skulls, less the beak of course


WOOOHHOOOO I'm the missing link!!!


now ya'll bow down to me and stuff!



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 04:58 AM
link   
Dna testing? I'm sure the results wont be inconclusive but instead something along the lines of what i posted below

www.youtube.com...
edit on 30-7-2012 by TheNewKid because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 05:02 AM
link   
I know people want it to be some sort of alien-human hybrid, but it just isn't. There are medical abnormalities and some serious physical problems in the skeletons presented, but that doesn't make them aliens.
However, researching them may shed some light on various medical issues that can still happen and be treated, especially in third world countries that don't have the same level of medical care that other parts of the world have.

Our inquisitive nature leads us to dream about "what might be", but with testing that's been done on so many of the previously found skulls as well as this skull, they're human. Don't stop dreaming about finding something more and definitely keep asking questions about what may be. This just isn't one of the cases that are without answers.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 05:18 AM
link   
Fascinating.Can't wait for the results.I hope their able to extract the needed material for DNA testing from the bones.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 05:51 AM
link   
Such skulls has been found in various places across the globe. And in case they are truly conducting DNA testing, I would be very interested in the results. However, I wonder if the results concur with the Alien origin of these skulls, will they be published, EVER...?
As far as I am concerned, I am sure, like many 'other' discoveries of ancient aliens and DNA samples, this will also get drowned and go into the secret vault.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 07:30 AM
link   
reply to post by SLAYER69
 


It is known that elite class in Peru used tools to deform babies head into this shape, but what is not known if this practice was performed to make us look close(er) to ET visitors..,



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 07:46 AM
link   
reply to post by DARREN1976
 


I remember it cromagnum, like a 357 magnum.
Sometimes I forget to change it's spelling The skull of a Cro-magnon/neanderthal is sloped back at the top from the eye brows. I have a couple of friends with skull shapes that way. They are enthused by fighting. It's like something in their brain structure is different. Some people have flat faces and squarer chins, these people seem to think different than those with pointy chins and more triangular shaped noggins. This doesn't seem to be an intelligence sort of thing but a perception thing. There are some different looking head designs on people in the states of the old Soviet Union. Some of the shapes seem strange to me but are probably normal in their areas. I've never talked to one of these people to know if their thinking is different but then again it's a whole different culture and language so I wouldn't be able to tell I suppose.

The amount of skull above the eye sockets is larger than most humans. I recognize it because the area above my eyes is bigger than the area below my eyes also. I don't have a cone head though and I am sure that my sutures are in the right place
There are a lot of different skull shapes in people and I think that the variance does correlate to perception somehow.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 07:55 AM
link   
reply to post by PurpleChiten
 


I have a bow and arrows, you want me to bow you down?



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Some people are short with hardly no stomach area, their ribs go down low. We only seem to get access to what is considered normal shapes of people. I'm sure that not many people have seen a skeleton of a midget other than a bone specialist or forensics expert..



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 08:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Some people are short with hardly no stomach area, their ribs go down low. We only seem to get access to what is considered normal shapes of people. I'm sure that not many people have seen a skeleton of a midget other than a bone specialist or forensics expert..


That's a good point.
I am going to go find me a dwarf skeleton for comparison purposes.
Thanks for the good idea.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 08:43 AM
link   
reply to post by rickymouse
 


Um....I can't find anything so far.

Tried a lot of search terms too.

But not 1 authentic believable skeleton of a dwarf.
Someone please help find one so we can compare it for curiosities sake.

I'll keep looking but it appears this information isn't very widely disseminated. At least the photographic evidence part.

Judging by the photos of living dwarfs, I am inclined to believe their rib cages are quite far spaced from their pelvis. Just as in the 'normal' human skeleton. Not seeing much structural difference aside of their size.
edit on 30-7-2012 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 08:58 AM
link   
reply to post by CiAlice
 


Why not? It's good old facts. It is more likely that dna that made something human-like, is in fact, human.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 09:23 AM
link   
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Think about it, why would people photograph a midgets skeleton unless it was for a special purpose. The chances of finding one are slim to none unless someone has one and posts it. Most researchers are focusing on what we consider normal bodies and not much research is done on abnormal bodies except to identify the flaws that led to their difference. Maybe being tall is actually the flaw even though we think it's normal.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by SibylofErythrae
 


Some articles say that the suture line of the plates of the skull are different in these skulls. The skulls of the people trying to elongate the skulls have the same suture lines as normal. You can't change the suture pattern by reshaping the skull to a conehead.


There are people's with differing suture lines on their heads. These are called Wormian bones.

en.wikipedia.org...

Now this just points out that in modern humans this trait exists.

There is an assumption made that because something exists now and can be found in the species that it must have always existed. This assumption isn't necessarily true. So really I am just pointing out that differing suture lines are currently a trait that can be found in all human groups. That this trait might be an introduced trait is not actually contradicted by its existence in modern humans.

edit on 30-7-2012 by SibylofErythrae because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by DARREN1976
 


I remember it cromagnum, like a 357 magnum.
Sometimes I forget to change it's spelling The skull of a Cro-magnon/neanderthal is sloped back at the top from the eye brows. I have a couple of friends with skull shapes that way. They are enthused by fighting. It's like something in their brain structure is different. Some people have flat faces and squarer chins, these people seem to think different than those with pointy chins and more triangular shaped noggins. This doesn't seem to be an intelligence sort of thing but a perception thing. There are some different looking head designs on people in the states of the old Soviet Union. Some of the shapes seem strange to me but are probably normal in their areas. I've never talked to one of these people to know if their thinking is different but then again it's a whole different culture and language so I wouldn't be able to tell I suppose.

The amount of skull above the eye sockets is larger than most humans. I recognize it because the area above my eyes is bigger than the area below my eyes also. I don't have a cone head though and I am sure that my sutures are in the right place
There are a lot of different skull shapes in people and I think that the variance does correlate to perception somehow.


I know exactly what your saying, I've known a few sloped-skulled people in my time, there eybrow ridges actually overhang their eyesockets believe it or not!! Probably genetic throwbacks to an earlier primordial time...



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 01:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by muzzleflash

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Some people are short with hardly no stomach area, their ribs go down low. We only seem to get access to what is considered normal shapes of people. I'm sure that not many people have seen a skeleton of a midget other than a bone specialist or forensics expert..


That's a good point.
I am going to go find me a dwarf skeleton for comparison purposes.
Thanks for the good idea.


Dwarves do have the same length torso's as average humans, it's their extremities that are shorter, thats a fact you might want to remember when delving in to your research.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 01:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by DARREN1976

Originally posted by muzzleflash

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by muzzleflash
 


Some people are short with hardly no stomach area, their ribs go down low. We only seem to get access to what is considered normal shapes of people. I'm sure that not many people have seen a skeleton of a midget other than a bone specialist or forensics expert..


That's a good point.
I am going to go find me a dwarf skeleton for comparison purposes.
Thanks for the good idea.


Dwarves do have the same length torso's as average humans, it's their extremities that are shorter, thats a fact you might want to remember when delving in to your research.


That would be impossible for me to remember though, because I never knew it to begin with.

Thanks for the info though, learn something new everyday.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 01:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by PurpleChiten
I gave one of the sources, look back at the post.
There are several other sources as well that are linked to it but I thought wikipedia would be the easiest for most folks to follow. There are severa sources from the science academies and several universities that can be googled pretty easily too



You gave a reference to the "Star Child" not the one being discussed in this thread. She was asking about this story's skull not that one. You responded to both her and my inquiry dismissively out of hand.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by PurpleChiten
 


Do you have a link to that proof? The little face just looked under stress, the body dehydrated and the total picture to me seemed like a child who had suffered from genetic defects and then died from hydrocephalus.



posted on Jul, 30 2012 @ 07:56 PM
link   
FINNALY!! Haha I've been waiting for them to do something with those disgusting looking creatures. I would be pretty shocked however if it comes out to be human. Where can I see more pictures of this thing?




top topics



 
163
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join