It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Intersting film but would have been better if they'd explained what had happened. Going by the sickness of the father and a few others it hinted at nuclear war.
Were not allowed guns in the UK but as this film showed, your f'd without one.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Intersting film but would have been better if they'd explained what had happened. Going by the sickness of the father and a few others it hinted at nuclear war.
Were not allowed guns in the UK but as this film showed, your f'd without one.
The ash and assumed nuclear winter alluded to a nuclear war. They stated in the movie plant life would not grow and almost all animals and insects died off. If this did happen what would be the point of surviving? Humans can't survive alone, and I think this was the point of the author.
It was a true doom and gloom movie that brings on real depression after watching.
But the obvious downfall of the movie for me was they found a unlooted bunker under a house, does this not allude to this being a safe area? This bunker was filled with supplies needed to survive. They heard a dog bark and this spooked the old man to run with the kid. Would cannibals have a dog? Would people be cannibals if they had a fully stocked bunker? They found the perfect place to be and ran like hell from it, this really bothers me for some reason.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Intersting film but would have been better if they'd explained what had happened. Going by the sickness of the father and a few others it hinted at nuclear war.
Were not allowed guns in the UK but as this film showed, your f'd without one.
The ash and assumed nuclear winter alluded to a nuclear war. They stated in the movie plant life would not grow and almost all animals and insects died off. If this did happen what would be the point of surviving? Humans can't survive alone, and I think this was the point of the author.
It was a true doom and gloom movie that brings on real depression after watching.
But the obvious downfall of the movie for me was they found a unlooted bunker under a house, does this not allude to this being a safe area? This bunker was filled with supplies needed to survive. They heard a dog bark and this spooked the old man to run with the kid. Would cannibals have a dog? Would people be cannibals if they had a fully stocked bunker? They found the perfect place to be and ran like hell from it, this really bothers me for some reason.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
reply to post by EqualizerUK
I guess you missed the part were the man woman and two kids at the end of the movie that had been following them had the dog?
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Don't get me wrong I really liked the movie, it set a tone that most are very unfamiliar with. Most on here talk about a shtf situation as jumping in the pick up truck and heading to the hills and everything would be fine. This is unlikely, most have no idea what a shft would look like or what it would take to survive.
But this one area of the movie with the bunker is perplexing to me. They failed to realize there situation and kept running for the coast and this ultimately cost the old man his life, when they had found there safety but didn't see it.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
reply to post by EqualizerUK
I think this was the point of the movie. If the shtf how many would die because they failed to see there real situation? I didn't read the book but I think I might.
There flight to the coast also reminded me of Zombieland and the girls heading to the amusement park. Running away attempting to find normality in a world turned upside down.
Originally posted by EqualizerUK
I saw this film ages ago ....how would you survive this type of SHTF world?edit on 26-7-2012 by EqualizerUK because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Intersting film but would have been better if they'd explained what had happened. Going by the sickness of the father and a few others it hinted at nuclear war.
Were not allowed guns in the UK but as this film showed, your f'd without one.
The ash and assumed nuclear winter alluded to a nuclear war. They stated in the movie plant life would not grow and almost all animals and insects died off. If this did happen what would be the point of surviving? Humans can't survive alone, and I think this was the point of the author.
It was a true doom and gloom movie that brings on real depression after watching.
But the obvious downfall of the movie for me was they found a unlooted bunker under a house, does this not allude to this being a safe area? This bunker was filled with supplies needed to survive. They heard a dog bark and this spooked the old man to run with the kid. Would cannibals have a dog? Would people be cannibals if they had a fully stocked bunker? They found the perfect place to be and ran like hell from it, this really bothers me for some reason.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
reply to post by EqualizerUK
It was completely unrealistic. Is Chernobyl a wasteland? no is anywhere that has radiation damage devoid of life? no.
They found the perfect spot to be and it was well stocked with food and supplies, then they heard a dog bark got scared then left? Because they didn't want to be a victim of cannibals. If the people had supplies they would not be cannibals.edit on 26-7-2012 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EqualizerUK
Originally posted by grubblesnert
to bad you were not there. What with you keen skills and level head
Originally posted by LDragonFire
reply to post by EqualizerUK
It was completely unrealistic. Is Chernobyl a wasteland? no is anywhere that has radiation damage devoid of life? no.
They found the perfect spot to be and it was well stocked with food and supplies, then they heard a dog bark got scared then left? Because they didn't want to be a victim of cannibals. If the people had supplies they would not be cannibals.edit on 26-7-2012 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
Glad i made an impression !
E