It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Akragon
I see no contradiction because I am applying historical context, something I have suggested you also do twice now. You're talking about two covenants separated by a cross and condemning the latter for not being identical to the former when the former was fulfilled at the cross. And I wasn't talking about John's anointing but his nature as a human.
Originally posted by Akragon
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Akragon
I see no contradiction because I am applying historical context, something I have suggested you also do twice now. You're talking about two covenants separated by a cross and condemning the latter for not being identical to the former when the former was fulfilled at the cross. And I wasn't talking about John's anointing but his nature as a human.
what you're saying does not change the meaning of the words...
When john said it, the line was from a judaic perspective... Paul took it litterally... and both cases contradict what Jesus actually said... God is "Greater" then himself... Not equal to himself...
edit on 4-8-2012 by Akragon because: (no reason given)
I also believe in One God, that's why I call God "Him" and not "them".
John 10
28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.
Jesus clearly makes reference in verse 28 that no man can pluck his sheep out of HIS own hand, then says that no man is able to be plucked from his father's hand. Last, but not least, Jesus says....
I AND MY FATHER ARE ONE.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
I do not expect you to understand the bible, but it says what it says and i have shown you folks over and over and over.
You always seem unable to directly address a chapter or a verse that I bring up from the bible...
instead, you quote from unrelated verses, especially Pauls works and then try and draw an imaginary connection to the verses that I originally brought up.
but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.
Ah, so thats where that theology about God taking on the form of a human comes from. Ridiculous.
You discard everything else in the bible about Jesus being the servant of God and cling on to an isolated verse or two from Paul to present your case that Jesus is God.
What I find absurd is that Paul is someone who many christians themselves suspect of being a false apostle.
John 13:16
Verily, verily, I say unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him.
Originally posted by Akragon
Originally posted by adjensen
reply to post by Akragon
No, what you said was that
I've found most Christians tend to see what they want to regardless of what is actually said...
and I asked for examples in scripture where Paul directly contradicts Christ.
Still waiting for one.
O i c...
I guess we could start with the example i already gave...
Philippians 2:6
6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
>
Equal indeed... says paul...
Who, being in very nature a God,
did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,
but made himself nothing,
taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
and became obedient to death—
even death on a cross! (Philippians 2:6-8 NIV)