BREAKING! House passes to AUDIT The Feds

About time this happened, now we might see where and how much of the money is appropriated and to who!



WWW.CAMPAIGNFORLIBERTY.ORG

reply to post by Vinny5036


Www.campaignforliberty.org

reply to post by Vinny5036


Hey! This is exciting, post a link and snippet.

Score 1 for Ron Paul!

NO FREAKIN' WAY!!!!!

Am I living in 'Bizarro World' or something?!?!?
DId that REALLY just happen?

Pinch me!

Does the average joe even comprehend what this means?

Do you even have a link or were you just expecting us to take your word for it?
Nevermind, I'll have to look myself.
If this is true I'll not be asking Santa for anything this year.

Guys, I'm sorry, I'm not very proficient yet with pasting links. I got the news from CAMPAIGNFORLIBERTY.ORG

Well, I just contacted my senators and am going to encourage others to do the same.

Campaign for Liberty

reply to post by Screwed


Yeah. It means that if any audit actually happens, everything will balance, foot, and tie up nice and tight. What else could happen?

not so fast !!!

it goes to the senate next.

we can see first hand how Dirty Harry & Co. will get bought off !!

Do you really...REALLY....think that more government auditing of the Fed is going to show anything up??

And do you seriously think that RP thinks it will??

Really??????

Originally posted by xuenchen
not so fast !!!

it goes to the senate next.

we can see first hand how Dirty Harry & Co. will get bought off !!

Dollar to a doughnut it sits there in committee until after the election...

Amazes me they call the Republican dominated house "do nothing" while the Democrat controlled Senate has yet to even pass a budget since Barry took office.

reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul


Of course it will. Silly question, actually.

If they have nothing to hide, they wouldn't mind. They are worried about "political influence" which means they're worried about people getting pissed and demanding congress act.

Very easy read. Not sure how you missed it!

reply to post by Vinny5036


This is good news, BUT, knowing the audit biz VERY well....an organization that complex would be a nightmare....and....Managment (the Fed), would hold all the cards.

Its like auditing Santa Claus. If you accuse Santa of overstating his inventory:

1) What is the recourse?
2) He WILL find a way to tell me that I don't understand the transaction (it's all in the WIP / Elf accounting)
3) He can always make more toys at almost 0 cost....

So, DEFINITELY a step in the right direction -- but lets not get our hopes up!
,

reply to post by unityemissions


That doesn't really answer my question & is a bit of waffle really - think about it a bit.

The presumption around here is that there IS something to hide - that the Fed is crooked and/or working as part of the NWO, etc.

And if that is true then you'd expect the govt to be just as crooked wouldn't you? Again that is the common presumption around here.

So making a few noises about the government doing more auditing of its own compliicity is not going to reveal that complicity.

So rejoicing that the government is going to audit the Fed a bit more is like congratulating yourself on hiring a wolf to kick the foxes out of the chicken coop.

Since Congress created the Federal Reserve, doesn't this raise the question as to why Congress has to 99 years after creating that agency pass legislation allowing them to audit that agency? Congress created the charter that allows for the Federal Reserves existence and Congress has the authority to revoke that charter. The question is, then, why does Congress need to pass a bill allowing them to run an audit? Smoke and mirrors? Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain and just do what the Great and Powerful Oz tells you to do.

Sen Reid is now saying that the bill 'won't even make it to a vote on the senate floor'. Funny how easily politicians can change their minds (values and convictions) over the years:



People don't get much more hypocritical than that, folks.

Apparently one senator (majority leader) has the power to 'vote' for the other 99 on any piece of legislation (one that has already been passed by our elected representatives) he wants. Helluva constitutional republic we've got going here, eh?

Here's a complete list of our reps that voted against it -

Nay D Ackerman, Gary NY 5th
Nay D Andrews, Robert “Rob” NJ 1st
Nay D Bass, Karen CA 33rd
Nay D Becerra, Xavier CA 31st
Nay D Blumenauer, Earl OR 3rd
Nay D Bonamici, Suzanne OR 1st
Nay D Brady, Robert PA 1st
Nay D Brown, Corrine FL 3rd
Nay D Butterfield, George “G.K.” NC 1st
Nay D Capps, Lois CA 23rd
Nay D Capuano, Michael MA 8th
Nay D Cardoza, Dennis CA 18th
Nay D Carney, John DE
Nay D Carson, André IN 7th
Nay D Castor, Kathy FL 11th
Nay D Chu, Judy CA 32nd
Nay D Cleaver, Emanuel MO 5th
Nay D Clyburn, James “Jim” SC 6th
Nay D Conyers, John MI 14th
Nay D Cooper, Jim TN 5th
Nay D Crowley, Joseph NY 7th
Nay D Cummings, Elijah MD 7th
Nay D Davis, Danny IL 7th
Nay D Davis, Susan CA 53rd
Nay D DeGette, Diana CO 1st
Nay D DeLauro, Rosa CT 3rd
Nay D Deutch, Ted FL 19th
Nay D Dicks, Norman “Norm” WA 6th
Nay D Dingell, John MI 15th
Nay D Edwards, Donna MD 4th
Nay D Ellison, Keith MN 5th
Nay D Engel, Eliot NY 17th
Nay D Eshoo, Anna CA 14th
Nay D Fattah, Chaka PA 2nd
Nay D Frank, Barney MA 4th
Nay D Fudge, Marcia OH 11th
Nay D Gonzalez, Charles “Charlie” TX 20th
Nay D Gutiérrez, Luis IL 4th
Nay D Hanabusa, Colleen HI 1st
Nay D Hastings, Alcee FL 23rd
Nay D Himes, James CT 4th
Nay D Hinchey, Maurice NY 22nd
Nay D Holt, Rush NJ 12th
Nay D Hoyer, Steny MD 5th
Nay D Israel, Steve NY 2nd
Nay D Johnson, Eddie TX 30th
Nay D Johnson, Henry “Hank” GA 4th
Nay D Kaptur, Marcy OH 9th
Nay D Keating, William MA 10th
Nay D Kind, Ronald “Ron” WI 3rd
Nay D Larsen, Rick WA 2nd
Nay D Larson, John CT 1st
Nay D Lee, Barbara CA 9th
Nay D Levin, Sander MI 12th
Nay D Lewis, John GA 5th
Nay D Lowey, Nita NY 18th
Nay D Maloney, Carolyn NY 14th
Nay D Markey, Edward “Ed” MA 7th
Nay D Matsui, Doris CA 5th
Nay D McCollum, Betty MN 4th
Nay D McDermott, James “Jim” WA 7th
Nay D Meeks, Gregory NY 6th
Nay D Miller, Bradley “Brad” NC 13th
Nay D Miller, George CA 7th
Nay D Moore, Gwen WI 4th
Nay D Napolitano, Grace CA 38th
Nay D Neal, Richard MA 2nd
Nay D Olver, John MA 1st
Nay D Pallone, Frank NJ 6th
Nay D Pelosi, Nancy CA 8th
Nay D Peters, Gary MI 9th
Nay D Price, David NC 4th
Nay D Rangel, Charles NY 15th
Nay D Reyes, Silvestre TX 16th
Nay D Rothman, Steven NJ 9th
Nay D Roybal-Allard, Lucille CA 34th
Nay D Rush, Bobby IL 1st
Nay D Ryan, Timothy OH 17th
Nay D Sánchez, Linda CA 39th
Nay D Sarbanes, John MD 3rd
Nay D Schakowsky, Janice “Jan” IL 9th
Nay D Schwartz, Allyson PA 13th
Nay D Serrano, José NY 16th
Nay D Sewell, Terri AL 7th
Nay D Shuler, Heath NC 11th
Nay D Sires, Albio NJ 13th
Nay D Slaughter, Louise NY 28th
Nay D Stark, Fortney “Pete” CA 13th
Nay D Thompson, Bennie MS 2nd
Nay D Towns, Edolphus “Ed” NY 10th
Nay R Turner, Robert NY 9th
Nay D Van Hollen, Christopher “Chris” MD 8th
Nay D Velázquez, Nydia NY 12th
Nay D Wasserman Schultz, Debbie FL 20th
Nay D Watt, Melvin “Mel” NC 12th
Nay D Waxman, Henry CA 30th
Nay D Wilson, Frederica FL 17th
Nay D Woolsey, Lynn CA 6th

Notice a trend folks?

reply to post by Signals


They all belong to the party that supposedly hates rich bankers. But whoops I guess they love rich bankers after all. Some of these clowns are actually supposed to be ultra 'liberal', real supporters of the 'people'. Guys like that moral genius Olver from central MA.

Please take note of these traitors for the next election cycle.

hmm then we can audit the audit just to keep them honest

It would just be a show trial to appease the people. With little to nothing resulting from it. Other than the people having there belief in a fair and just g-v renewed. Basically it would be a Lenonist, soviet, communist show trial. It's trickery that's it.