Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
If this is all misdirection to keep us distracted while they pass new laws to screw us over even more than what they are now then by the very code
they work off they have to some documentation about it online. It might be hidden or obscure but it will be there. By their own warped code of conduct
they have to display it.
If we ignore it because we are too stupid to pay attention to the real issues that's not their problem. Seek and you shall find
I think you might be on to something here
. I remember watching a c-span hearing a few months back about a bill being proposed that, on the surface, seemed perfectly logical. The Bill would
have made it illegal, under federal law for any "identified terrorist" to purchase, own, or possess any form of explosives or firearms.
NO problem so far. Nobody wants a "terrorist" to have such killing devices, right?
Seems that the Senators on the panel were Levin, Pelosi, Schumer, Liberman, and Edwards. The witnesses or "experts" were the heads of HLS, FBI,
TSA, BAFT, etc.
They discussed the potential threats from Muslim extremist cells within the US of which they "estimated" were about 140, (but we're keeping an
eye on them). They talked about fanatical "religious groups", white separatists, civilian militias and other "dangerous" groups.
Then they discussed what they feared the most (in Their Words) the "lone wolf" terrorist.!!!! TaDaaaa.
Someone with no criminal background, living under the radar, who could pass a background check for the purchase of firearms. The profile was
insinuated to be white, highly intelligent, maybe even college educated, possibly former military,sociopathic or anti-social "tendencies" again with
no criminal history, but with a "possible" grudge against the government for" whatever" reason.(Now who could possibly have a grudge against the
gov.) There was even the comment "that even those of us here(senators) could even be targets."
Also included in the firearms and explosive ban were all persons listed on the gov.s no fly list.
The only member to not immediately jump on the cheering section was Edwards
He wanted to know how many people were on the no fly list? Answer: not sure but we estimate between 400,000-5000,000.
How does one get placed on the list?---We are not at liberty to say.
What criterion is used to determine who gets placed on the list?----That is classified information!
How can one find out if he is on the list?-----Call our offices, but we determine if we will divulge that info.
If someone is placed on the list mistakenly, how does he get off the list.-----We don't know....
And now we have that dreaded "lone wolf". See we told you so.
As the church lady used to say....how convenient!
If that bill passed, or is still under consideration, I confess, I honestly don't know.
But what I will say is that if it becomes law as written, almost anyone is this country can be deemed a terrorist by any number of arbitrary acts or
opinions determined by any of the alphabet agencies.
As such, you will be "asked" to surrender any and all of your firearms.
No need for congresspersons to jeopardize their career, by voting for gun control when the gov. can confiscate them under the cloak of national
security or supposed terrorist threat.
Motive for a Manchurian Candidate??????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Naaaa! They wouldn't do that would they?