It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
There are times when a taser could be an appropriate response. There are more times when you should just swallow your pride and walk away. However. You never NEED a gun until you need it badly and right now. There are times when a lesser response just will not do.
Then you will die, or at the least be victimized. That is your choice to make. As for me, I choose to defend myself, my family, and my property.
Originally posted by sopheruk
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
There are times when a taser could be an appropriate response. There are more times when you should just swallow your pride and walk away. However. You never NEED a gun until you need it badly and right now. There are times when a lesser response just will not do.
i agree but i wouldnt use violence though
Originally posted by Wongbeedman
reply to post by Finalized
Or it might play a part in stopping nutjobs like holmes getting hold of weapons so easily?
I dont see why people cant consider that
Originally posted by sopheruk
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
There are times when a taser could be an appropriate response. There are more times when you should just swallow your pride and walk away. However. You never NEED a gun until you need it badly and right now. There are times when a lesser response just will not do.
i agree but i wouldnt use violence though
Originally posted by Wongbeedman
reply to post by mysterioustranger
People make me laugh saying that.
I'd like to see a gun kill someone without a person behind it. Why is it all or nothing in america?
Guns make it 10x easier to kill a person.
Making it a killing tool. If it was a defence tool it woulnt be a gun it would be a bulletproof shield