It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another Gigantic Mothership UFO Photographed Near Sun By NASA

page: 7
116
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 07:16 AM
link   
Strange, Looking at the photo, something is definetly there, you can see streaks underneath the object, like an exhaust or energy. Now whether the object is really next to the sun or is some sort of distorted artifact caught in front of the cameras lens, is very questionable These objects are becoming the norm, I have always wondered if a craft could survive next to the sun, of course it couldnt with our tech, but other High tech civilaztions may have masterd that already. good find Star for you



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 07:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by Glassbender777
Strange, Looking at the photo, something is definetly there, you can see streaks underneath the object, like an exhaust or energy. Now whether the object is really next to the sun or is some sort of distorted artifact caught in front of the cameras lens, is very questionable These objects are becoming the norm, I have always wondered if a craft could survive next to the sun, of course it couldnt with our tech, but other High tech civilaztions may have masterd that already. good find Star for you


You sure its not just a glitch or distortion of the image

Hey before you think im being skeptical im not, i know ets and ufos exist, all im saying is that not everything is a mothership thats all



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 07:43 AM
link   
Ok guys it is a UFO now what? We already knew intelligent being exists in the universe. So what does this prove. and where do we go from here


Seriously though people want to believe so much and have proof. That they throw common sense out of the window. We can't just rage at people because they point out the obvious. It doesn't mean your beliefs are invalid just at this time there is no proof. If it wasn't for 'debunkers' every bloody dot in the sky would be a UFO to some people...



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


A couple of Jupiters long

Dont be daft!!

I really think this is nothing.... no way is that some huge ship couple of jupiters long



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:01 AM
link   
reply to post by MommyWoman
 


I really don't believe that people are just dismissing the opinion from the OP about the anomalies in these videos and images but - much like myself to be honest - I don't believe it's the right attitude to have to look at an image such as the one shown by the OP and then just say, 'oh, it's an anomaly in space, therefore it's an alien mothership'. It's an unhealthy outlook to have.

I, perhaps more than anybody, am desperate for some evidence of alien life and extra-terrestrials but you've got to look at all angles before jumping to conclusions, no matter how much you want to see what you want to see. If there was some way to zoom in to this image and to show a genuine and intelligent structure to this 'UFO', then I'd be over the moon but, as it is, it's basically just a blurry blip on a picture captured from NASA.



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
I thought I'd screen grab this photo (which is included in the original link) to give viewers a better idea of how large this is.
I estimate this being a couple of Jupiter's long.




What's the sphere sillhouette at the top right hand corner just touching the sun, kind of floating on top of the sun? Any idea's, photographic anomoly, planet behind the sun, or what?



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:20 AM
link   
reply to post by Char-Lee
 


nope, a cosmic ray hitting the CCD transversally would have the same effect as a very bright light source, and will appear a number of pixels long, until it is through the CCD.
edit on 24/7/2012 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Am I the only person who hasent made this correlation?






posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by jough626
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


A couple of Jupiters long? So this thing is SUPER huge! I wonder if it's always been there, but we just couldn't see it due to lack of tech.



Always there? hmmm... why do you say that? Not being picky, it's just that the last day I've been reading up on the "Black Knight" sattelite that was allegedely discovered in 1960, ever heard of that? That was supposedly orbiting Earth for around 13,000 years, maybe more, just waiting to be activated by man reaching the technological stage where they where able to send radio signals in to space....seriouslyy, read up on it, wetther true or not, it certainly makes for an interesting read.



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:42 AM
link   
reply to post by DARREN1976
 


I hate to be that guy but that black knight sat has been put to bed. If you research the names of the guys who apparently discovered it you will see there are no sources about it other then blogs posting the story about the black knightsat.

One of them, lincon LaPaz, has an interesting enough history with the Roswell incident, fireballs and projectbluebook.



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by np6888
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Phage is not just a professional debunker, he takes all of his info from NASA. Do you think any individual human being, professional debunker or not, could have the knowledge that he has?
And you are right that he never admits defeat. That's because it's the Illuminati's job to deny everything in this game(sometimes I wonder if he'd be this stubborn, if I didn't mention this).

However, surely he must know what the endgame is like, so I've offered him to turn back from the darkside, but I guess he'd rather lose till the end.


Sorry but who the heck is Phage that everybody talks about so much? Isn't he just a member like anyone else? Yes he's knowledgable, gives a lot of valid points in most cases, but I have caught him in bias, dismissing sometimes things that he himself is not certain about.

Why do you worship him? I don't mind having his opinion around but as it happens, he can be wrong too.. why the fans?



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by DrHammondStoat

If you're (the author not the op) are calling something a mothership then you're not looking at it without prejudice.



Agreed! However, I did run across this tidbit in UFO Blogger. I doubt they'd get many readers if they called it a lens flare (we got that covered with NASA and Phage) So....doesn't take a mathematician to do the math
but I do wholeheartedly agree withcha
"Mothership" should be stricken from the UFO dictionary unless someone first- handedly witnessed one.


But if you want to play semantics, then what would an object in the sky that was spewing forth multiple UFO's be called? Could you then call that a UFO mothership I wonder?



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien
***snip***
Phage is a quasi professional debunker not an astrophysicist nor is he qualified, in my opinion, to be an objective UFO investigator.


Unlike a huge number of ATS'ers claiming Aliens and Motherships.

They are definitely way more qualified to be objective.

Whatever became of "Deny Ignorance".



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Griffo515
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Am I the only person who hasent made this correlation?






Am I the only person who hasn't made this correlation?



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:54 AM
link   
reply to post by Human_Alien
 





Absolutely not!!! I never said this was a 'mother ship' or anything close to that.


Oh you didn't say anything close to that, are you sure...



In the above screenshot, you can see a huge UFO emitting light, which can't be a sun reflection due to its odd light emitting angle.


Looks pretty close to me.

Again thanks for the truly entertaining thread you know how to give me a good laugh.....


Mothership....



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Occam's Razor (as applied by most people)

Most Simple Explanation ..... > ..... Alien Mothership

Occam's Razor (as applied by member 'Human_Alien')

Alien Mothership ..... > ..... Most Simple Explanation



Absolutely not!!! I never said this was a 'mother ship' or anything close to that. What I am saying is, this might not be a glitch. After that, I am in no position to even wager a guess as to what this might be.

If someone said it's a mother-ship, then I will give that due-consideration. But unlike the debunkers (and stand-up comics like yourself) I don't profess to KNOW anything.Nor do I conclude. I just have very strong opinions and I leave my door, ajar.
BIG DIFFERENCE!!!!

What I do know is, intelligent aliens exist. Many many races. That is absolutely the truth. And once you realize that, you learn not to assume again! Unless you 'know' ..........this probably won't make sense to you. Others will know what I'm saying.

G'day!


I think you need to read the title of your own thread and then come again and tell us again your not saying its a mothership. Sorry its a gigantic mothership.



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 08:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bixxi3
reply to post by DARREN1976
 


I hate to be that guy but that black knight sat has been put to bed. If you research the names of the guys who apparently discovered it you will see there are no sources about it other then blogs posting the story about the black knightsat.

One of them, lincon LaPaz, has an interesting enough history with the Roswell incident, fireballs and projectbluebook.


i lready know that, but its interesting none the less, especially the LDE's (echoes) that where involved at the time and before it, apparently they happen when signals fired towards the sky hit reflective material like planes etc. and are bounced back to sender, but the time delay with these LDE's i'm talking about didnt add up, it was just too much time passed for them to have been bounced back from something in our atmosphere, and at the time there was no sattelites of ours at all in space orbit, no space junk, nothing...thats why i said in my original post "wether you believe it or not, its an interesting read" in regards to other stuff that was linked to the stories i read abut the black night, but thanks for the heads up though mate, nice to see some peope still have their heads screwed on around here...PEACE!!



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 09:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by Imtor

Originally posted by Griffo515
reply to post by Human_Alien
 


Am I the only person who hasent made this correlation?






Am I the only person who hasn't made this correlation?
no yor not, saw that yesterday on another thread and atomatically thought o that a while ago when i first read this thread, your not alone my friend, never alone...



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 09:15 AM
link   
Probably a photographic error. Definitely looks weird though, how it is a distinct horizontal line with the vertical light emanating. Peaked my interest. Good find!!



posted on Jul, 24 2012 @ 09:18 AM
link   
If we see a giant object near the sun, the only logical guess of what it could be is a mothership....


And I'm not sure how you can write "another".... Have you proven that the other pics with items near the sun are Giant Motherships???


Not fully understanding picture = Giant Mothership
edit on 24-7-2012 by jhn7537 because: (no reason given)



new topics

    top topics



     
    116
    << 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

    log in

    join