Another Gigantic Mothership UFO Photographed Near Sun By NASA

i believe the term "mother ship" is used because they are massive ships that contain many other ships in its "womb" for transport over long distances, when upon arrival, the ships/armada are released from inside the "mother ship" an aircraft carrier could be considered a mother ship ..large vessel with many smaller vessels that launch from within it upon its arrival

i do love these pictures though, i just wish there were more of them on different slides, there must be 1 before and 1 after this image do they show up on those, does the object stay for extended period of time, does it turn directions? out of all the mother ship/UFO around sun topics the best example i have seen so far is the silver orbs, in the green stereo version soho you can clearly see the object on several different pics, before and after, shows movement, and even appears to go through a cloud like substance and the light from sun reflects like it should as it moves from behind to the front(camera facing) of sun and as for the size? i mean really who cares if we can see it, it most likely can destroy us? i mean i don't know any ships, rockets, aircraft or cars we have that is even close to the size of a state, province , country, continent or earth size do you? sometimes i put a piece of paper up to the screen and trace its outline on the paper, when you take away from the screen youd be amazed how much the outlines look more like ships/manmade objects. chunks of rocks dont look like they "have purpose" most of the things people say might be glitches you see things in areas that would be like thrusters/engines and look to other side (front) they are pointed or smoothed round kinda like we would build ships like challenger rocket ect but i guess we wont know till they are saving us, or laughing at us as they enslave us,only time will tell lol

reply to post by Human_Alien


I'd say it's impossible to judge the size without knowing the distance of the object. It could be a million miles beyond the sun or six feet away from the camera. Theres no way to even estimate without knowing the depth of field in this image.

I could find thousands of these glitches given enough time.

Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
More rubbish.

These are image artifacts, and high energy particles hitting the sensors.

StephenHanardADG preys on the dumb/gullible. This is who discovered this "mothership".

The guy doesnt know what he is looking at, and literally just uses anything that looks remotely weird. I could find thousands of these glitches given enough time.

Streetc(r)ap1 is another one for using high energy particle collisions and calling them UFO's. If you go to the NASA website it even explains what these streaks and blobs are.

If there were something the size of Jupiter near the sun, it would be easily observed from earth. The fact is, what you are seeing is a fraction of a millimeter wide, and has nothing to do with advanced lifeforms refueling.

Look at streetcap1 channel, he finds a single frame (like hannard) from the millions available. Sticks an arrow next to it with a question mark, then lets the ignorant debate it. KNOWING exactly what it really is. One of these rays has got him 800k views on one video. 800k views = £1200-£1800 in adsense.
Dont believe me??? check out this site, and type in the name of a youtuber. Preferably someone with lots of views.

www.socialblade.com/youtube

Hundreds of new ufo channels have opened in the past couple of months showing solar rays, in all sorts of shapes and sizes. In a single 24hr period i could probably find 50-100 "ufo/motherships" next to the sun.
Not all the rays hit head on, some overlap giving strange shapes. These are the ones people tend to use.

Dont want thousands, find ten......
2nd....

reply to post by Human_Alien

What i have established is that since 1967 all ufo's/craft are 7th density,What we want to see are 3rd density craft willing to land and introduce them selves,They have tried in the past only to be shot down,I believe it was because of cold war paranoia that they were shot down.Lets pray our friends out there forgive us and give Earth another chance.

Originally posted by Evolutionsend
reply to post by LoveisanArt

 

You say the larger the planet the larger the being, while others claim the extra gravity would result in smaller beings.

Exoskeletal animals on earth can not grow large on land. They are too heavy to move. In water they grow larger. Water has less gravity due to buoyancy. The lower the gravity, the larger or more massive a being can grow. More gravity = less size or mass.

That is human physics... human skeletons.. extraterrestrial bodies are a complete different make up in their genes. Just something to consider

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Originally posted by boncho

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Some crafts have been known to pop in and out of 3D in a matter of a nano-second. I'm just sharin' what I've been told. So because this appeared in one single frame, for me, it gives me more reason to consider, perhaps it moved (disappeared).

I was told Jack grew a giant beanstalk but I am yet to find any magical beans.

Did you try trading your cow? ask around;-0

It was me, I ate those magical beans - PARRRPPP!!!! - (excuse me!)

Here are some new shots of the image processed through some different filters:

Click here for more information.

Originally posted by kurthall
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

Okay to me it seems, it is a small piece of the sun blown off. If you look at the light given off, it is the same light give off from the sun... also, if it were a UFO it would have not even begin to be able to give off light brighter than the sun, which is what this object appears to do. The reason I feel that it appears to be brighter than the sun is due to the distance from the object to the sun...If you took even our brightest light bulb it would in no way give off the light that seems to be coming from this "mother ship" sorry dude no go!

edit on 24-7-2012 by kurthall because: (no reason given)

What often happens is we rule possibilities out due to our understanding of physics and limited knowledge of the Universe.

Modern science has only been at it (this time) for 200 years. The Universe is billions and billions and billions of years old. For instance, something can't be brighter than the Sun? Why not? Because WE can't produce or haven't seen something brighter? That's the kinda of logic (which many have) that often keeps us from seeing the bigger possible picture.

Thank god for quantum mechanics. At least they explore the unseen and unthinkable.
Sorry dude. Your ability to think out side the box is sorely lacking.

reply to post by Human_Alien


So there is no way to convince you what you're seeing is not a spaceship? When so many things were pointed out why it is not...

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
Here are some new shots of the image processed through some different filters:

Thanks my friend (hate the music though )

When the colors are inverted it looks to be a solid object. Also, the fact that this shows up in only one frame doesn't conclude anything as others would have us believe. I'm not saying this because it's my thread but I find this fascinating. I think it looks incredibly like the China UFO from 2010 that I posted somewhere earlier on this thread.

Keep up the nice contributions and threads PlanetXisHERE. We might not always be right but at least we know (not think. KNOW) there's more going on out there!

Originally posted by Kurokage
Many people have already posted that they are attifacts!!

Well there ya have it. Why the hell are we wasting money on NASA, CERN, JPL, NOAA, MIT etc when we have 'people' in ATS 'posting' what's what?

Thanks Kurokage! I'll pass along your memo to my people

Originally posted by Imtor
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

So there is no way to convince you what you're seeing is not a spaceship? When so many things were pointed out why it is not...

I never said it's a space ship. If anything it's an anomaly.

Just like I can't prove an abduction??????????
No one can prove what this is. Not from our vantage point. We can only speculate and that's about it.

I am honestly unsure as to what this is. And that's where I stand.


Here's the thing, no one has proven aliens exist HOWEVER, I (we) know they do. So, due to that one (but HUGE) epiphany, I don't put too much stock in our empirical ability.

Click here for more information.