It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Seriously, is there ever any cause to require a 100 round drum, or a 40 round clip?
How about paramilitary AR-15 style weapons?
What are these used for anyway?
Certainly not for hunting or home defense.
If you need that many rounds for either of these things, you need to spend more time on the range practicing.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Originally posted by clayb2004
reply to post by MrXYZ
"The issue here isn't guns...it's that he was able to get them WITHOUT BACKGROUND CHECKS!! That's just crazy..."
What makes you think he did not have a background check??? Why would a 24 year old male college student not pass the required federal background check assuming he had no prior arrests?
There is absolutely no reason given (that we know of as of now) this guy should be barred from owning a weapon prior to this incident.
“Gun control? It's the best thing you can do for crooks and gangsters. I want you to have nothing. If I'm a bad guy, I'm always gonna have a gun. Safety locks? You will pull the trigger with a lock on, and I'll pull the trigger. We'll see who wins.”
Originally posted by defcon5
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
Seriously, is there ever any cause to require a 100 round drum, or a 40 round clip?
How about paramilitary AR-15 style weapons?
What are these used for anyway?
Certainly not for hunting or home defense.
If you need that many rounds for either of these things, you need to spend more time on the range practicing.As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Originally posted by Taupin Desciple
Originally posted by lambs to lions
To blame guns on gun-related violence is ridiculous.
Taken by itself, I hope you realize just how silly that statement is.
You're right, guns have nothing to do with a bullet leaving the chamber, barrel and nozzle and then lodging itself into the target. How silly of us to think otherwise.
Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by MrXYZ
I highly doubt 1 hero with a gun could have saved anything, he would probably panic with the rest of them due to the gas and would run to save his life, not stand and fight a guy with bullet proof armor and heavy weaponry. Its all talks in order to support.
Originally posted by muse7
Once again the main culprit in the aurora shootings, virginia tech and columbine was the easy availability of guns to enable these lunatics to go on their rampage.edit on 7/22/2012 by muse7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TerribleTeam2
reply to post by Phenomium
So tell me Phenom, what have you got planned to stop the US Government from taking the last of your remaining freedoms before they enact any Gun Restriction laws then???
This type of thinking proves the point I made earlier to Projectvxn. Cheers