Something struck me about the Colorado killers picture.

reply to post by claireaudient

I'm disturbed by their eyes which "scream" a profound mental instability.

You are so perceptive!!!

Maybe you could join a pre-crime unit and identify these people before they kill someone.

reply to post by elrem48


Excellent quote.
Well said.

COMPARE SIDE X SIDE


Each subject in the operlaps was reversed - one on top and one on the bottom for comprison sake.
OVERLAPPED IN PHOTOSHOP - TRANSPARANCY


OVERLAPPED IN PHOTOSHOP - TRANSPARANCY #2

Both of those "smirks" look like the work of the liquify tool in photoshop to me.

Originally posted by TKDRL
Both of those "smirks" look like the work of the liquify tool in photoshop to me.

Was having similar thoughts while doing the transparancies.........good observation.

I would bet they are on the same drugs that MKultra.
its creepy how close they look.

reply to post by lonegurkha


I have to admit I thought of it too this morning. I downloaded those pics and blew them up in paint. Notice the odd shading on the corners of the mouth. Strange pixels. Maybe someone with more knowledge in this sort of thing can explain this.

The first one is of Holmes. Notice the edges on the pixels at the right. It doesn't really "blend in" with the rest of the shadows. Very jagged looking



And this is Lougheed


Look at the box like shadow at the right

Thoughts?

I thought when I first saw his pic that he looked schizoid.
It was that vacant stare of the eyes and the semi-smile. Gave me a case of cognitive dissonance.

Didn't someone say he was on meds for mental problems?

Amazing likeness there....Just may be the same tool being used by TPTB.

reply to post by FlySolo


Maybe their mouths were stretched from all that screaming when they were being mkultra-ed by the security services.

Months of mind wiping torture and screaming will alter the shape of the corners of your mouth from the constant stretching and tearing.

reply to post by Ilovecatbinlady


No need to be cheeky. I'm just pointing out the odd pixelation.

reply to post by lonegurkha


He reminds me of Zachary Levi from the TV show 'Chuck'.

This is what I believe was done to both pictures, to make them look deranged. Keep in mind, this was a 2 minute hack job here lol. I could make it up much more subtle and believable if I wanted to spend an hour or two on it.

Original


Hacked up

Don't be surprised at Zionist MOSSAD involvement in both masacres.

HOLMES AND LAUGHNER ARE BOTH JEWS (perhaps Sayanim) ............Isn't it awfully strange too that a disproportionate number of these recent serial killers are Jews. Crypto Jews actually.


Heith Ledger's death was very suspicious indeed and the connection to him having been the last actor to play the role of the Joker should not be overlooked here as significant.

BTW.........Zionist/Jew owned Wikipedia deletes all mention of SAYANIM

see below

Sayanim deleted from Wikipedia

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference.

15:28, 21 July 2010 Black Kite (talk | contribs) deleted "Sayanim" ‎ (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sayanim)

I am seeing a memory hole and activist removal operation going on now. Things can only get worse

www.davidicke.com...

This picture looks fake to me. like the girl was added.

Originally posted by mainidh
reply to post by Vitruvian

 

And? You're saying they are the same person now?

And they're using the ONE photo that elicits the response you're showing them...

Sorry - I don't understand the question? I said nothing about anyone being the same person - my post points to a COMPARISON only..........if that's what you mean ?

They definetly have that same crazed look, so ya I can definetly see a resemblance, they are both nutt cases, I swear anyone starts opening up fire at my family and me, I will return fire for self defense, seems like the random shooting sprees, are on the rise. I have a concealed liscence, and I suggest others do the same. If someone knows that a lot more people have begun to carry, it might deter the Crazy Lunitics from carrying out a pointless act of murder. Communities and people of all walks of life should ban together and put the fear of god in anymore potential mass murder Terrorist

reply to post by Vitruvian


So you now know what the Palestinians have to put up with...

It is an Aurora every day in the West Bank.

reply to post by HangTheTraitors

media photos of the "shooter" were digitally altered to make them appear deranged.

I'm sorry, being a professionally trained journalist and media photographer (with the student loans and fancy pieces of paper that go with them) I will have to take issue with this statement as it applies to the US.

Yes, I will agree that this did apparently happen in Australia; apparently rules for journalism ethics there are way different; remember Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News and UK's The Sun fame, is an native Australian. Murdoch has absolutely no moral ethical code when it comes to journalism. I refuse to watch Fox News. And I sincerely mean no disrespect to you or any other Australian (other than Murdoch) by saying this.

That being said, AP (Associated Press) - the national wire service has actually fired photogs for digitally altering photos; they even went head to head with the DoD in 2008 a couple of times 'cause DoD has a penchant for altering file photos supplied by them to the media (gee go figure right-- When did DoD ever tell the truth about anything?!:@@

AP Suspends Use of U.S. Army Photos Over Digital Alteration

AP's director of photography Santiago Lyon said, "For us, there's a zero-tolerance policy of adding or subtracting actual content from an image."

AP drops freelance photographer who Photoshopped his shadow out of image

AP pictures must always tell the truth. We do not alter or digitally manipulate the content of a photograph in any way. The content of a photograph must not be altered in Photoshop or by any other means. No element should be digitally added to or subtracted from any photograph. The faces or identities of individuals must not be obscured by Photoshop or any other editing tool.

Our local paper the Charlotte Observer fired their photog for photoshopping the color on a pic of a sunset backlighting a firefighter in 2006; the Sacramento Bee just fired their photog for altering an image of a snowy egret and a frog. Another Photographer Fired for Manipulation: The Importance of Maintaining Honesty in Images

It is not just the fact that they are manipulating the images, but they are lying to the readers. ....What you’re seeing is my lens, my perspective of the world, or how best I can interpret it to you...... If I ever find myself questioning whether or not to alter an image, then perhaps the image wasn’t that great from the start.

If your gonna play the game here in the US you gotta know the rules, and here in the US Rule #1 is don't fu## with the photo. Rule #2 is basic Investigative Journalism 101 folks - always consider your source.

Now with that off my chest, yes I agree, but it's not so much the eyes as it's the smile; that "I've got a secret and I'm not gonna tell you" dastardly smile. Downright eerie.

First of all my condolances and love go out to all of the family and friends. If a person was possesed by an evil entity (not saying that this guy was or not) if the entity killed people and the person had no control of their body and mind would they be innocent or guilty? and how would you know that the person was not human. Please don't accuse me of saying that I said he's not guilty I'm just asking a question. Is demonic possession taboo or is it written in the laws that he/she could be sent free as they were not in control of their actions. Love & Light x

could it be that they both have bad teeth?