It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Originally posted by Kharron
reply to post by getreadyalready
Many athletes around the world who can barely afford tennis shoes but make it to the Olympics through sheer strength of will and training would disagree with you.
I think you're completely missing the spirit and the idea of the Olympics.
Good point, I'm looking at it from a purely American standpoint. There are people from all around the world that become elite in their sport without the need for all the fancy junk we have in America, and in fact they often beat our athletes.
BUT, here in America, you'd never make it to the big-time without a sponsor.
The English have always been under the dominion of the banksters... The US was brought back in the fold in 1913.....
EXCELLENT POINT! & well put!
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
This is how corporations wish the whole world could be. Everyone eating McDonalds, Drinking Coke and wearing sports brands. The Olympic village is a Corporatocracy in microcosm. No room for any competition or individuality.
Some of these sponsors are also some of the worst corporations in the world responsible for environmental and industrial disasters.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by Kharron
Whilst I would really question a persons integrity if they even considered wearing a McDonalds etc t-shirt to attend anything, why would someone even possess such an item of clothing,
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Are they kidding? What kind of police state nightmare from 'V for Vendetta' are you people running in England?!?
First... am I missing something here?? Are they REALLY saying members of the PUBLIC cannot attend an event they have paid to attend while wearing clothing that has a symbol or brand contrary to something among the sponsors of the games?!?!
I have to be misunderstanding. This has to be about the Athletes...Staff....employees of the venues. Right? This can't possibly mean John Q. walking up to the gate to take their paid seat........can it? This goes beyond police state. It really does.... I've never heard such a thing!edit on 20-7-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)edit on 20-7-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: cleaned up a bit..still waking up
In a sane world the Games would be funded by a co-operative, with each nation contributing to the cost. Sponsorship would be appropriate, ethical, and moral. And the athletes would be of amateur status, not multi-millionaire professionals!
this is unconstitutional
Originally posted by TheEnlightenedOne
The sad thing is that the majority if not all of the people attending the olympics will actually obey that rule.
Originally posted by froglette
I remember the days when company's gave out clothing with their brand on them for free. It was their way of advertising.
Originally posted by PrinceDreamer
When a company sponsors me then they can have a say on my wardrobe contents, until then Addidas can suck my hairy sack.
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
I think it's a disgrace that McDonalds and Coca Cola are the main sponsors of the Olympic Games. In fact, it's outright disgusting. Sport promotes health and fitness; these two sponsors promote the exact opposite.
In a sane world the Games would be funded by a co-operative, with each nation contributing to the cost. Sponsorship would be appropriate, ethical, and moral. And the athletes would be of amateur status, not multi-millionaire professionals!
Until that day comes I won't support the Games one iota. I won't be going, and I won't be turning on the TV.
I'll read a book instead, or go to the park.