It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by muse7
That's right the adobe certified expert is of course WRONG and the random blog is of course RIGHT!
This is the exact thing I was expecting from a birther thread
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by NeoVain
If the moderators are watching, may I recommend a moratorium on threads like this in the near future/
Deny ignorance..Deny birthers.
Originally posted by Djayed
reply to post by NeoVain
This story is only on right wing anti Obama blogs & sites and not real news sites. This is just the right trying to call at anything to get Obama out. Just like the garbage coming out of Arizona.
edit on 7/20/2012 by Djayed because: Math Guy
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA.
However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.
Originally posted by Hawking
You do realize you've blown this whole thread by citing a blog, right?
Originally posted by NeoVain
It seems the true birth records are finally found, proving once and for all the the one he released was an adobe photoshop forgery.
The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by NeoVain
If the moderators are watching, may I recommend a moratorium on threads like this in the near future/
Deny ignorance..Deny birthers.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by NeoVain
If the moderators are watching, may I recommend a moratorium on threads like this in the near future/
Deny ignorance..Deny birthers.
If this is true then this fraud was in the works for a very long time,and I find that scary.What else do they have in store for the American public?
Originally posted by darkbake
I think this is solid evidence proving that Obama was born in Kenya. I wasn't convinced until now. This means that his administration went out of the way to lie about his birth in Hawaii, even going so far as to create a fake birth certificate. What else is going on here besides that, I wonder? Is there more to the story?
I know that a lot of people are going to put politics into this, saying these crazy Republicans are just trying to make an issue out of nothing, but I'm no Republican and I think this is an issue.
I do admit it would be nice to see this birth certificate, though.edit on 20-7-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
Instead of arguing over the veracity of a blog I have done what the OP should have done. I have contacted the BNA so they can either confirm or deny the story. Unfortunately it may take up to two weeks before I receive a response.