It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by r2d246
No they analysed the vine and it's a liana vine only found in south america.
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by waypastvne
Mate you're not going to convince me that dust was fire-proofing, sorry. Wild speculation that is irrelevant to how the towers collapsed.
Again what you have to do is demonstrate how sagging trusses can pull in columns, and without the truss itself, or the connections, failing first.
Originally posted by stew4media
the day before he's making an announcement about this money 1.2 trillion dollars missing. They couldn't account for it. Not a few million or a hundred million or even several Billions. but over a 1,200,000-million dollars USD, GONE!. paper work in building 7.. GONE!
The report that uncovered the trillions appeared at the end of February 2000, before Bush had even been elected, and Rumsfeld and others had spoken about this before, on more than one occasion, and for months before the attacks:
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by stew4media
the day before he's making an announcement about this money 1.2 trillion dollars missing. They couldn't account for it. Not a few million or a hundred million or even several Billions. but over a 1,200,000-million dollars USD, GONE!. paper work in building 7.. GONE!
Why do truthers keep posting this blatant lie? The money was NOT missing, and was announced
The report that uncovered the trillions appeared at the end of February 2000, before Bush had even been elected, and Rumsfeld and others had spoken about this before, on more than one occasion, and for months before the attacks:
www.911myths.com...
This "money missing lie" keeps getting repeated by truthers who do not bother to do any research!
Originally posted by Varemia
Isn't demolition even more wild speculation, since there is no physical evidence of it?
There is concrete evidence of fireproofing, so there is no doubt that it was in the dust cloud. Your only contest can be that you don't believe that the majority of the dust was fireproofing.
Originally posted by stew4media
Because there is no way in hell that is building 1 or 2.
Originally posted by waypastvne
59th floor south tower.
Originally posted by RockLobster
Click here to learn more about this warning.
o no i am not .but it is scary to think that the average adult in the uk can not figure out that new york is 5 hrs behind . i have had to point this out to thousands of people over the years ? are we all wrong ?????? i am videoing at the moment just normal people what they have to say .the scary thing is nobody has thought of it //watch this space
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by geobro
Its amazing that you are the ONLY UKer on ATS who claims that. Well, maybe funny would be a better word than amazing......