posted on Oct, 9 2004 @ 06:04 AM
Our smoking ban in NY bans indoor smoking in just about all workplaces...."for the protection of the employees". Kodak quickly got a waiver from
this law...(they probably were afraid that someone would throw their butt in the wrong location and blow Rochester up!!)
I have no problem with them banning smoking in resturants, or bars, or offices even, but in those workplaces where the work itself exposes the people
to hazards far worse that shs, well, the original restrictions (designated smoking areas) were far more saner....especially in cases such as
Kadak.....where sending them outsite would have been much more hazardous.
Also, a better way to have gone would have been to create a law that protected people from ALL of those irritants that are well known to cause
discomfort amoung some members of our population.....as well as require businesses to be more upfront concerning those substances that are in the
workplace that are liable to cause iriritation, asthma, skin irritation, liver problems, lead poisoning, heart disease, nervous disorders, ect. ect.
matter of fact, the time to inform the public regarding these dangers would be in the high schools, as they are deciding just what type of career
they desire to go into.