Object anomalies around the Sun - compilation.

reply to post by Manhater


Thanks, that does look like a donut, mmmmm, I'm getting hungry!

Were any of the wannabe mensa's on here able to give a decent explanation?

Hope you're feeling better !

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

Thanks, that does look like a donut, mmmmm, I'm getting hungry!

Feast on this!


Read all about it in this post www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


Might I make a suggestion?

You may want to watch a few of the other videos from ADG(UK) before you decide to believe anything they post on youtube,

Here is a favorite of mine...

reply to post by DenyObfuscation


I think that only one of images in the OP video contains one of those twin donut spaceships. I'll read later what those who "do not believe in ET's no matter what" have to say.

reply to post by tsurfer2000h


Yes, but I didn't show that video, did I.

In the video I posted in the OP, all the images come from NASA.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

In the video I posted in the OP, all the images come from NASA.

Is Hannard honest about what he posts?

He claims in the description of this vid

Technical Data:
Cor 2-A
Date: 2012: 04: 02
Time: 01:54:00

See anything in this image? I don't.


NASA

I'd be careful with any videos from ADG(UK). There are several threads here on ATS that have ended up in the HOAX bin because of their videos. As you said, they got their images from NASA, etc.

But do all the images match up? Anything that is in theirs but not NASA's?

I think you'd do beter to make you're own compilation video (and considering how passionate you are about the unknown or way out there theories, I'm sure you'd do a good job putting one together).

As for the size that keeps being mentioned of objects in the video:

There's no frame of reference to determine the size. It could be very tiny and very close, or very big and very far away. Here's a thread I did talking about that, and how hard it is for our eyes and brains to determine size from a 2D image with no other references:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I also touch upon the "donut" UFO's too.

the objects seen in this video are the very same that cause schizophrenia. They have technology which allows them to simulate human environments, sounds for example. but they also have impressive technology as far as matter replication, they have communicated to me and left several evidences behind to proove they exist and have technology. These beings can communicate with almost anything we consider non-centient like planets or other stellar or spiritual bodies, these beings can talk to them and allow us to talk to them, research how many schizophrenics talk to God, not very many, research how many schizophrenics think they are pursued by aliens, many of them. Research how many schizophrenics belive the illuminati or masons or governments are mind controlling them, many. These ships along with human technology are responsible for the greatest lie in history itself, and thats no lie.

reply to post by truthermantwo


I had a dream a while back that the town I live in was being invaded by aliens...The ships landed and people were screaming and running around trying to figure out what to do all while the aliens walked around blasting people with their blasters that would transform humans into their species. Blasters blasting, people screaming and I barricaded myself in the garage listening...Waiting...Listening to people changing formation into something else...Until they figured out I was the only one left in the neighborhood...As they circled the house...That's all I remember in the dream, it was #ing cool. Yet, I hate when my dreams come true sometimes, You know?...

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

Yes, but I didn't show that video, did I.

It doesn't matter if you posted that video it came from the same uploader that has as another member said has had his videos put in the hoax bin, so with all that said the uploader has a history of hoax videos such as the one I posted above.Sorry just can't trust videos from Stephen Hannard ADG(UK).

Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

Yes, but I didn't show that video, did I.

It doesn't matter if you posted that video it came from the same uploader that has as another member said has had his videos put in the hoax bin, so with all that said the uploader has a history of hoax videos such as the one I posted above.Sorry just can't trust videos from Stephen Hannard ADG(UK).

That is false logic and you know it.

Just because you watch CNN and one of their reporters does a shoddy story that turns out to be false, does that mean everything coming from CNN is false? Of course not. (not that anyone watches CNN anymore)

If someone wants to dig up the originals and show they have been altered - fine.

Until that point these videos speak for themselves.

reply to post by eriktheawful


Ah Eric, you are a model poster and impossible to ignore.

I'm aware the youtube channel in question has had some controversy in the past, but the images can only have come from NASA, and are basically close-ups/filtered images of what has appeared earlier in the year - from NASA.

I did read your thread about UFO size and you did make some good points, even in our everyday lives we can make mistakes about the size of something if we have no frame of reference when looking into a void like the sea or sky.

I agree if you see an object between the Sun and the camera it could be anywhere, it could be 20 ft from the camera and look huge. But if you see an object which appears to be blocked by the Sun or one of it's CME's then you know the object is at least as far away as the Sun, and if we can see it on the camera it is probably huge.

Considering our race is just 200 years out of the industrial revolution, if there are other ET races out there, they have probably been around for at least thousands if not millions of years, in which case it is not a stretch for the mind with some latitude to envision they have planetary sized craft.

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


Actually this is false logic:

In my opinion, these objects do not appear to be natural objects of the solar system, and I doubt man made craft could operate so close to the Sun. So I guess that leaves us with one alternative.

Originally posted by ATSGrunt
Blasters blasting, people screaming and I barricaded myself in the garage listening...Waiting...Listening to people changing formation into something else...Until they figured out I was the only one left in the neighborhood...As they circled the house...That's all I remember in the dream, it was #ing cool. Yet, I hate when my dreams come true sometimes, You know?...

that's so Hollywood

Originally posted by zacroyce
reply to post by InhaleExhale

 

The video is pretty self explanatory, if you don't know the answers to your questions then oh dear and if you do know the answers, as you said you did before, then can you shed some light and not the same old space debris...etc explanation.

If its self explaining would you like to give your interpretation of the said video.
What reference points are being used to determine the size and distance of the anomalies?
Sorry love but i enjoy learning/doing and am not very fond of teaching. This is why most of my posts are designed as questions to understand the logic and reasoning of others not about the actual statements being made. Its up to them to think of what they are saying and if it has any relevance to reality.

With subjects as these, there are a number of places one can go to learn and there are also a number of places where one can go to verify what they have learn t, on top of that there are even more places one can go and actually do what they have learn t.

I have already shed enough light on the statements made and if one wishes not to expand their thinking on their own who am I to force what I know or believe on to them.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

Actually this is false logic:

In my opinion, these objects do not appear to be natural objects of the solar system, and I doubt man made craft could operate so close to the Sun. So I guess that leaves us with one alternative.

I belielve I stated quite clearly at the outset that this was an opinion - would you like me to provide you with the definition of an opinion?

reply to post by PlanetXisHERE


The logic you've used to form that opinion, is false.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

The logic you've used to form that opinion, is false.

Can opinions be wrong?

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE

 

The logic you've used to form that opinion, is false.

Can opinions be wrong?

Actually, yes. Yes they can be wrong.

You wake up one morning to find you have a very runny nose and are sneezing a lot. You form the opinion that you have a cold.
The symptoms persist, so you go to the doctor to see about getting some relief for those symptoms because OTC drugs don't seem to be working. The doctor examines you and announces you have a sinus infection, and writes out a prescription for you.

Your opinion that it was a cold was wrong.

Anyone can have a opinion. But that opinion can be right, or it can be wrong.

reply to post by eriktheawful


Technically that is more of a mis-diagnosis but I see your point.

However, in cases where ultimate proof to conclusively prove or disprove a supposition does not exist, as in this case, opinions can not be wrong.

If anything in this case the proof weighs heavily to the side these are ET craft, but I will be the first one to admit the proof is not conclusive.

I have yet to see excellent or even solid alternative hypotheses for what we are seeing in these videos, despite the hyperbole from some (not referring to you Erik).