It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
ATTENTION!!!!!!!!!!
All further ill-mannered and/or off topic posts will be removed.
This thread will be temporarily closed so all may be aware.
You are responsible for your own posts.
We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.
--Off Topic, One Liners and General Back Scratching Posts--
Re-opened........
edit on Thu Jul 19 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EqualizerUK
i think i got my point across on this thread
E!
Originally posted by aaron2209
Originally posted by EqualizerUK
i think i got my point across on this thread
E!
Hmmm I could have sworn this entire thread was quite pointless.
I'm not seeing what point was made
All I'm seeing is someone bailing on their own troll thread. Fail
Originally posted by EqualizerUK
Originally posted by Kapkalna
reply to post by EqualizerUK
you have lost me now....can you explain what you wanted the apology for ....? E
I refuse to roleplay that you dont know your behavior is wrong. I'm looking through the wikipedia page of addiction for you, to find the word disease. All I have to do is find addiction to be a real thing and your ghost face disappears, right? Right back into the lamp.
en.wikipedia.org...
This is why you're going to be in trouble when you're hooked. Substance abuse is coupled with psychological problems. The key is to provide empathic bond with the user, to which you're immune while sober.
You do know that wiki is the most unreliable place to find facts on the web?
E
Originally posted by JailTales
Lol, you do know that only people who've never been on the internet believe that about Wikipedia, and you, it seems.
Wikipedia has citations, often in their hundreds, at the bottom of every article. What's unreliable about that?
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by JailTales
Lol, you do know that only people who've never been on the internet believe that about Wikipedia, and you, it seems.
Wikipedia has citations, often in their hundreds, at the bottom of every article. What's unreliable about that?
I had that argument with my Uni professor, she was adamant she wasn't going to accept Wiki articles so I just scrolled to the bottom, clicked on the actual references and used those instead. When she commended me for having found different references, I pointed out what I had done. You should have seen her face go bright red...
edit on 20/7/2012 by Kryties because: (no reason given)
reply to post by EqualizerUK
these people are scum bags that are to weak to say no