It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2. they are just trying to make a better human ( yea right, they probably want the worst for us )
3. they want to make lower our life span
Originally posted by boncho
2. they are just trying to make a better human ( yea right, they probably want the worst for us )
Why would they only want the worst for us Soymilk?
3. they want to make lower our life span
We had shorter lifespans for centuries. Why bother bringing it up as high as it did?edit on 17-7-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)
do you think they know how to raise up our lifespan?
do you think they might have purposely lowered it?
Gene therapy trials on humans began in 2004 on patients with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID). In 2000, the first gene therapy "success" resulted in SCID patients with a functional immune system. These trials were stopped when it was discovered that two of ten patients in one trial had developed leukemia resulting from the insertion of the gene-carrying retrovirus near an oncogene. In 2007, four of the ten patients had developed leukemia.[2] Work is now focusing on correcting the gene without triggering an oncogene.
Originally posted by Stalker619
reply to post by SoymilkAlaska
Look up vaccine gene replacement on youtube. But there was a post on here a few years ago that had a youtube video talking about using vaccines to make radical religious individuals more docile developed by darpa. I can't recall what the name of the post or the video was though.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by SoymilkAlaska
do you think they know how to raise up our lifespan?
do you think they might have purposely lowered it?
Modern medicine, hygiene and agricultural developments have increased our lifespan. This is just a common fact not a conspiracy.
Lowered it how? You are suggesting genetic engineering in humans but current trials are no where near something that could be used on a wide scale level without inducing cancer or other complications as this field of research is heavily regulated and progress has been slow.
Gene therapy trials on humans began in 2004 on patients with Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID). In 2000, the first gene therapy "success" resulted in SCID patients with a functional immune system. These trials were stopped when it was discovered that two of ten patients in one trial had developed leukemia resulting from the insertion of the gene-carrying retrovirus near an oncogene. In 2007, four of the ten patients had developed leukemia.[2] Work is now focusing on correcting the gene without triggering an oncogene.
en.wikipedia.org...
You live in a very paranoid delusional world soy milk.
Originally posted by chericher
Interesting line of inquiry, soymilk. I've often wondered about viruses in general - in vaccines and in the wild. Like, do they have their own objectives or purposes? And could they be used to change, fix or degrade dna?
Originally posted by chericher
And now there is talk of an anti-smoking vaccine. Supposedly, it involves something that's supposed to lock onto and block nicotine receptors, permanently. Now, they don't really know what these receptors do besides, and you know they will intentionally not properly investigate potential long-term effects. Not when they've got something they can hype and the uncritical masses out there will see it as vaccine v. cigarettes, the way girls still get the HPV vax 'so they don't get cancer.' The majority of consumers really are that simple-minded, and will believe the sound bites and call the skeptics crazy. And they will line up, and pay, to be injected, and feel so proud that they are doing their part for the good of the herd.