Who here has seen 'what the bleep do we know'?

I just got done watching the documentary movie, what the bleep do we know, and i thought it was amazing!
it made me think about how our brains are connected with our thinking a lot more than i did, i was not able to see how the two could be related, but now i get a better grasp of it.

I just want to see how many people have seen it and see what you thought about it.


for people who have not seen this movie, it goes over a lot of different things, but it talked about how our atoms and molecules actually pop in and out of our reality, and from that is how alternate realities would be created from.

it also talked about our physical reality is in a way a projection from our own mind.

it goes over a lot of things for me to actually remember and write down here but here is the link to the movie for those who have not. It is a really great watch if your someone who is interested with metaphysics or just the creation of life, or any of the crazy mysteries of life haha.

www.youtube.com...

for those who have watched it....... did it make you think any differently on life? or on what our capabilities as humans are?
It made me think about things that i never really thought about before, and i have had some crazy thoughts about what life is and what is actually possible... and it just made me think even more that basically anything is possible.

I have seen it. but i dont remember much about it until i watch it again then ill be like "o yeah now i remember"

and no i dont think it changed my life because im still in the same position i was before and after i watched it.....on the couch.

It s an interesting movie, i still do not know what to do with it.

There are actually several threads with lots of info existing on the movie. If you type 'what the bleep' in the search function you will find them.

Happy reading.

reply to post by willrush


The movie misrepresented science and physics and what various scientist and thinkers had to say.

It had almost no truth in it.

I wasted some of my life watching it.

I saw it and... yeah... the makers of the movie are the sorts who take quantum science, fail to understand it, and represent it as, essentially, magic that can do whatever they want it to.

Sad to say, I actually own a copy of it, lol.

haha thanks for the replies.. and i guess when it comes down to it.. its just becomes a fun thought to think about haha.
but that sucks you didnt see how any of the information could be true.. i guess you've got to really let your mind go to be able to grasp a lot of the things they talk about.
but i still liked it

Originally posted by willrush
i guess you've got to really let your mind go to be able to grasp a lot of the things they talk about.

No, actually that's the problem -- you don't learn about science by imagining it.

If you want to learn about quantum physics, I would suggest consulting a physicist, not a psychic.

Try The Feynman Lectures (MS Silverlight required)

reply to post by adjensen


thanks!.. but what is it all about. before i go and downloading this thing to my browser

I did read a article a while back about how Quantum Physicists think every single thing in the universe is connected at a sub-quantum level. Very interesting...will have to watch.

Hey! I saw what the bleep and I loved it. I've heard some negative about it, but as a whole I think it does a great job at peeking your curiousity about the things you can't see.

I tend to think that no one knows the full truth about anything, and in many cases the 'truth' just comes down to your own opinion.

I think there is alot to be said and thought about with regards to how powerful faith or believing can be...our energetic body's and thoughts interact in ways that we really can't see...So, perhaps the movie wasn't 100 percent truth, but I thought it was a good mind ride..and hints at what other pieces of the puzzle are out there that we have no idea about.

However, I didn't like the leading lady...

reply to post by willrush


I've watched it many times, and have bought the CD for many friends and family. It is truly amazing and eye opening. The writer/director has worked on other projects as well, so you might want to check them out.

There were some articles and counter-documentaries trying to discredit What The Bleep, but the good thing is is that the message got out to a lot of people and the discrediting wasn't as prolific as they had planned.

This was released at mainstream theaters years ago, and I drove my kids almost two hours in the car to see it. Just a little eye opening from a parent!

They didn't understand it all, but we had a great discussion on the way home.

reply to post by willrush


Trust me, it is worth watching....

2nd line.

reply to post by chr0naut


Totally disagree.

Some of the theories in that documentary/movie have evolved---even since the release of the movie more than six or more years ago.

Quatum physics has indeed furthered the idea that an object can be in two places at once---which is where the hub bub about parallel universes comes from.

And it is WELL KNOWN that emotions are addicting and habit forming. Nothing at all misleading about that.

I don't see why it's so hard for people to understand that we create our own reality. Action follows thought. Period. If you control your thoughts, you control your actions and you control your life.

Seems pretty straight forward to me.

Originally posted by willrush
reply to post by adjensen

 

thanks!.. but what is it all about. before i go and downloading this thing to my browser

It is a series of seven video lectures on physics by Richard Feynman, one of the most engaging lecturers of our time. (Alternate versions and an article on them here.)

A person who is intrigued by the notions of quantum mechanics should take the time to try and learn what they are from a scientific standpoint.

I thought What the Bleep was an amazing film, and an excellent illustration of how we create our own reality. For those that are dissing the film, I think they need to go back and check out some of the physicists and theologians interviewed. The credits list them as M.D.s, PhD.s and M.Ss, and I think they may know a bit more than those making their never-ending snide remarks on ATS.

There is a greatly extended version [QUANTUM EDITION] with 3 DVDs, and 6 hours of additional interviews. I highly recommend it.

I'm sorry you had to see that. If I were you I would get rid of it or return it from where you got it. Not that it is a bad movie at all, but because the makers remade it completely. The "New" Version is called "What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole" It is exactly the same movie, however it is six double sided discs long. It was created as the first of its kind. By that I will explain.

"What the Bleep!?: Down the Rabbit Hole" has a "random" set into the discs. You put it in and watch the movie. There are main parts that remain the same each time, but the interviews of the scientists and speakers are random. In other words you could watch it a thousand times and never see the same version twice.

Each disc is the same way and covers a LOT more information in detail by a LOT more speakers.

I'm Glad you found it. For me it opened my eyes to a new World.

Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by chr0naut

 

Totally disagree.

Some of the theories in that documentary/movie have evolved---even since the release of the movie more than six or more years ago.

Quatum physics has indeed furthered the idea that an object can be in two places at once---which is where the hub bub about parallel universes comes from.

And it is WELL KNOWN that emotions are addicting and habit forming. Nothing at all misleading about that.

I don't see why it's so hard for people to understand that we create our own reality. Action follows thought. Period. If you control your thoughts, you control your actions and you control your life.

Seems pretty straight forward to me.

edit on 16-7-2012 by MRuss because: (no reason given)

Please review the Feynman lectures that someone else posted a link to.

The concepts of quantum superposition, the Pauli Exclusion Principle and non-locality do not imply that a particle can be in two places at once. They do imply that two particles cannot be in an identical state (the same place with the same charge, spin & whatever). Can you see that this is different than a particle being in two places at once? Two particles can also be quantum entangled, but this implies that one particle is in an OPPOSITE state to the other.

reply to post by willrush


There's a rather lengthy video delving into and debunking What the Bleep Do We Know? on youtube. It uses numerous references and the user making it makes a point to show the sorts of fallacies that the documentary indulges in.



The main complaint is that the makers of the documentary seem to take quantum physics/mechanics and misunderstand and misrepresent it in order to further a lot of New Age pseudophilosophical nonsense.

Originally posted by chr0naut

Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by chr0naut

 

Totally disagree.

Some of the theories in that documentary/movie have evolved---even since the release of the movie more than six or more years ago.

Quatum physics has indeed furthered the idea that an object can be in two places at once---which is where the hub bub about parallel universes comes from.

And it is WELL KNOWN that emotions are addicting and habit forming. Nothing at all misleading about that.

I don't see why it's so hard for people to understand that we create our own reality. Action follows thought. Period. If you control your thoughts, you control your actions and you control your life.

Seems pretty straight forward to me.

edit on 16-7-2012 by MRuss because: (no reason given)

Please review the Feynman lectures that someone else posted a link to.

The concepts of quantum superposition, the Pauli Exclusion Principle and non-locality do not imply that a particle can be in two places at once. They do imply that two particles cannot be in an identical state (the same place with the same charge, spin & whatever). Can you see that this is different than a particle being in two places at once? Two particles can also be quantum entangled, but this implies that one particle is in an OPPOSITE state to the other.

But... but... but... the Magic!

You and your logic... you killjoy, you...

Originally posted by chr0naut
reply to post by willrush

 

The movie misrepresented science and physics and what various scientist and thinkers had to say.

It had almost no truth in it.

I wasted some of my life watching it.

Typical Troll Response....

But back on topic, do some digging its some pretty interesting stuff. I'm a bigger fan of the secret, same sort of stuff. But I have seen big and tangible changes by implementing some of these ideas.

Practice it, you may be astounded