Iowa. Iowa is quite centrally located, might be a good place for a trade hub instead of Denver.
goo.gl...
You see if we put one in Scranton PA, and one in Stockton CA, then Iowa would be a good spot for a center hub.
But they have had all this voting fraud and scandal business. Let me see what else has been in the news...
Well it certainly looks like middle America and this project is targeting the middle class so I would say Iowa is a better case of need vs opportunity
than Denver and Denver is close to Stockton.
So probably this thread is a flare so that we will consider making Iowa a trade hub. And America will only get a few.
But Alaska should get one since otherwise they would be left out and there is enough commerce there to support one, and if we need to scale down the
facilities we could spend some of the money on docks or dock improvement. Thats the only exception to the 5 billion dollar hub sites, that they have
to support a facility of that size, which is about the size of Singapore Airport.
So to make one smaller, would mean that we have issues globally regarding fairness. So thats the only small option, is like where they also do harbor
improvement for shipping.
Otherwise its gotta look like thiS!
www.xjgj.com...
and this...
www.xjgj.com...
for Internet.
Better just have a gander at Alaska too...
goo.gl...
Well I don't think at this point I can justify it. If there was rail service down the coast then maybe.
Hard to say. Raw materials are good but I just don't think it can support a hub of this magnitude.
Not enough people, not enough commerce, Which is a shame but maybe someday.
Maybe they can get a node from Vancouver's hub. That would do I am sure.