It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by capod2t
This video, and the premis therein, does not reflect the OP's opinion.
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
According to their warped teachings, it is still possible to procreate. Even without orgasm, a certain amount of sperm can still be released, though not in the same quantity. As it only takes one good little swimmer...
Originally posted by elliotmtl
Originally posted by Cogito, Ergo Sum
According to their warped teachings, it is still possible to procreate. Even without orgasm, a certain amount of sperm can still be released, though not in the same quantity. As it only takes one good little swimmer...
That's not actually true...studies have shown that pre-ejaculate does not contain sperm. The only way it does is if you DO ejaculate and then have sex again without urinating...because some of the sperm from the previous time is left in the tubes. So I don't see how they can possibly not be hypocritical. Unless of course science is wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Flavian
It's called getting your tubes tied. Easy as that.
And really...why does the world need more kids? For every kid that's born in this country, 5 kids die over in Uganda. Why not adopt? Generate good karma!
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by Awen24
I would openly challenge any "Christian" to successfully prove that sex is a bad thing, using only the Song of Solomon to do so.
"Christianity" never said that sex is a bad thing, I would openly challenge you to successfully prove that.
On the other hand, it would not be dishonest to say that Christianity teaches that immoral sex (sex which serves to satisfy one's personal pleasure at the expense of other human dignity) is a bad thing. And I think that's a tough thing to refute. Care to try?