It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mwood
Han Solo
Capt. James T. Kirk
Capt. Malcolm Reynolds
How about those for experts!
Originally posted by BlueMule
If Jacques Vallee is right (he is), then we need to look to comparative mythology to understand the UFO phenomenon. That means we need to look to Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell.
UFOs are a psychic / mystical phenomenon, not a nuts n' bolts technology / biology phenomenon. That means any expert who advocates the ET hypothesis is a tool.
edit on 11-7-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BlueMule
UFOs are a psychic / mystical phenomenon, not a nuts n' bolts technology / biology phenomenon. That means any expert who advocates the ET hypothesis is a tool.
edit on 11-7-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Orkojoker
Originally posted by BlueMule
UFOs are a psychic / mystical phenomenon, not a nuts n' bolts technology / biology phenomenon. That means any expert who advocates the ET hypothesis is a tool.
edit on 11-7-2012 by BlueMule because: (no reason given)
I think you're wrong to make the assumption that ETI can't be in there somewhere. There's really nothing I've come across that leads me to the conclusion that the entire spectrum of UFO phenomena must have a single cause. I like Vallee, but I don't agree with his complete tossing of the ETH. There could certainly be more going on, but I think "aliens" holds up pretty well for certain subsets of the unknowns. Either way, it's a little premature to be saying that UFOs "are" this or that.
Originally posted by jheated5
There is no such thing as a UFO expert....